Literature DB >> 27696240

D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Symon Gathiaka1, Shuai Liu1, Michael Chiu1, Huanwang Yang2, Jeanne A Stuckey3, You Na Kang3, Jim Delproposto3, Ginger Kubish3, James B Dunbar4, Heather A Carlson4, Stephen K Burley2,5,6, W Patrick Walters7, Rommie E Amaro8,9, Victoria A Feher10,11,12, Michael K Gilson13,14,15.   

Abstract

The Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) ran Grand Challenge 2015 between September 2015 and February 2016. Two targets served as the framework to test community docking and scoring methods: (1) HSP90, donated by AbbVie and the Community Structure Activity Resource (CSAR), and (2) MAP4K4, donated by Genentech. The challenges for both target datasets were conducted in two stages, with the first stage testing pose predictions and the capacity to rank compounds by affinity with minimal structural data; and the second stage testing methods for ranking compounds with knowledge of at least a subset of the ligand-protein poses. An additional sub-challenge provided small groups of chemically similar HSP90 compounds amenable to alchemical calculations of relative binding free energy. Unlike previous blinded Challenges, we did not provide cognate receptors or receptors prepared with hydrogens and likewise did not require a specified crystal structure to be used for pose or affinity prediction in Stage 1. Given the freedom to select from over 200 crystal structures of HSP90 in the PDB, participants employed workflows that tested not only core docking and scoring technologies, but also methods for addressing water-mediated ligand-protein interactions, binding pocket flexibility, and the optimal selection of protein structures for use in docking calculations. Nearly 40 participating groups submitted over 350 prediction sets for Grand Challenge 2015. This overview describes the datasets and the organization of the challenge components, summarizes the results across all submitted predictions, and considers broad conclusions that may be drawn from this collaborative community endeavor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D3R; Docking; Free energy; Ligand; Protein; Scoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27696240      PMCID: PMC5562487          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9946-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  37 in total

Review 1.  Structure and mechanism of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone machinery.

Authors:  Laurence H Pearl; Chrisostomos Prodromou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Relationship between multiple sequence alignments and quality of protein comparative models.

Authors:  Domenico Cozzetto; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-01-01

3.  Understanding the impact of the P-loop conformation on kinase selectivity.

Authors:  Cristiano R W Guimarães; Brajesh K Rai; Michael J Munchhof; Shenping Liu; Jian Wang; Samit K Bhattacharya; Leonard Buckbinder
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  POSIT: Flexible Shape-Guided Docking For Pose Prediction.

Authors:  Brian P Kelley; Scott P Brown; Gregory L Warren; Steven W Muchmore
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Structure-Based Design of GNE-495, a Potent and Selective MAP4K4 Inhibitor with Efficacy in Retinal Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Chudi O Ndubaku; Terry D Crawford; Huifen Chen; Jason W Boggs; Joy Drobnick; Seth F Harris; Rajiv Jesudason; Erin McNamara; Jim Nonomiya; Amy Sambrone; Stephen Schmidt; Tanya Smyczek; Philip Vitorino; Lan Wang; Ping Wu; Stacey Yeung; Jinhua Chen; Kevin Chen; Charles Z Ding; Tao Wang; Zijin Xu; Stephen E Gould; Lesley J Murray; Weilan Ye
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 6.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Discovery and design of novel HSP90 inhibitors using multiple fragment-based design strategies.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Huth; Chang Park; Andrew M Petros; Aaron R Kunzer; Michael D Wendt; Xilu Wang; Christopher L Lynch; Jamey C Mack; Kerry M Swift; Russell A Judge; Jun Chen; Paul L Richardson; Sha Jin; Stephen K Tahir; Edward D Matayoshi; Sarah A Dorwin; Uri S Ladror; Jean M Severin; Karl A Walter; Diane M Bartley; Stephen W Fesik; Steven W Elmore; Philip J Hajduk
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.817

8.  CSAR benchmark exercise 2011-2012: evaluation of results from docking and relative ranking of blinded congeneric series.

Authors:  Kelly L Damm-Ganamet; Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Jeanne A Stuckey; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  A new generation of crystallographic validation tools for the protein data bank.

Authors:  Randy J Read; Paul D Adams; W Bryan Arendall; Axel T Brunger; Paul Emsley; Robbie P Joosten; Gerard J Kleywegt; Eugene B Krissinel; Thomas Lütteke; Zbyszek Otwinowski; Anastassis Perrakis; Jane S Richardson; William H Sheffler; Janet L Smith; Ian J Tickle; Gert Vriend; Peter H Zwart
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  86 in total

1.  Toward Fast and Accurate Binding Affinity Prediction with pmemdGTI: An Efficient Implementation of GPU-Accelerated Thermodynamic Integration.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Yuan Hu; Brad Sherborne; Zhuyan Guo; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Authors:  Xibing He; Viet H Man; Beihong Ji; Xiang-Qun Xie; Junmei Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Blinded prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity using Amber thermodynamic integration for the 2018 D3R grand challenge 4.

Authors:  Junjie Zou; Chuan Tian; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  CADD medicine: design is the potion that can cure my disease.

Authors:  Eric S Manas; Darren V S Green
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Hybrid receptor structure/ligand-based docking and activity prediction in ICM: development and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Authors:  Polo C-H Lam; Ruben Abagyan; Maxim Totrov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015.

Authors:  Xianjin Xu; Chengfei Yan; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Impact of the Protein Data Bank on antineoplastic approvals.

Authors:  John D Westbrook; Rose Soskind; Brian P Hudson; Stephen K Burley
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 7.851

10.  Relative binding affinity prediction of farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 using FEP.

Authors:  Christina Schindler; Friedrich Rippmann; Daniel Kuhn
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.