Literature DB >> 33206520

Accounting for the Central Role of Interfacial Water in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Ido Y Ben-Shalom1, Zhixiong Lin2, Brian K Radak2, Charles Lin2, Woody Sherman2, Michael K Gilson1.   

Abstract

Rigorous binding free energy methods in drug discovery are growing in popularity because of a combination of methodological advances, improvements in computer hardware, and workflow automation. These calculations typically use molecular dynamics (MD) to sample from the Boltzmann distribution of conformational states. However, when part or all of the binding sites is inaccessible to the bulk solvent, the time needed for water molecules to equilibrate between bulk solvent and the binding site can be well beyond what is practical with standard MD. This sampling limitation is problematic in relative binding free energy calculations, which compute the reversible work of converting ligand 1 to ligand 2 within the binding site. Thus, if ligand 1 is smaller and/or more polar than ligand 2, the perturbation may allow additional water molecules to occupy a region of the binding site. However, this change in hydration may not be captured by standard MD simulations and may therefore lead to errors in the computed free energy. We recently developed a hybrid Monte Carlo/MD (MC/MD) method, which speeds up the equilibration of water between bulk solvent and buried cavities, while sampling from the intended distribution of states. Here, we report on the use of this approach in the context of alchemical binding free energy calculations. We find that using MC/MD markedly improves the accuracy of the calculations and also reduces hysteresis between the forward and reverse perturbations, relative to matched calculations using only MD with or without the crystallographic water molecules. The present method is available for use in AMBER simulation software.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33206520      PMCID: PMC7725968          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  64 in total

Review 1.  Free energy simulations come of age: protein-ligand recognition.

Authors:  Thomas Simonson; Georgios Archontis; Martin Karplus
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 22.384

2.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 3.  Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: overview and issues.

Authors:  Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Toward Fast and Accurate Binding Affinity Prediction with pmemdGTI: An Efficient Implementation of GPU-Accelerated Thermodynamic Integration.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Yuan Hu; Brad Sherborne; Zhuyan Guo; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.

Authors:  Lingle Wang; Yujie Wu; Yuqing Deng; Byungchan Kim; Levi Pierce; Goran Krilov; Dmitry Lupyan; Shaughnessy Robinson; Markus K Dahlgren; Jeremy Greenwood; Donna L Romero; Craig Masse; Jennifer L Knight; Thomas Steinbrecher; Thijs Beuming; Wolfgang Damm; Ed Harder; Woody Sherman; Mark Brewer; Ron Wester; Mark Murcko; Leah Frye; Ramy Farid; Teng Lin; David L Mobley; William L Jorgensen; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner; Robert Abel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Computer-aided drug design at Boehringer Ingelheim.

Authors:  Ingo Muegge; Andreas Bergner; Jan M Kriegl
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  Recent theoretical and computational advances for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.507

8.  The crystal structures of the oligopeptide-binding protein OppA complexed with tripeptide and tetrapeptide ligands.

Authors:  J R Tame; E J Dodson; G Murshudov; C F Higgins; A J Wilkinson
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations for protein-ligand binding and inhibitor design.

Authors:  Daniel J Cole; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-09-06

10.  Calculation of Relative Binding Free Energy in the Water-Filled Active Site of Oligopeptide-Binding Protein A.

Authors:  Manuela Maurer; Stephanie B A de Beer; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fast Equilibration of Water between Buried Sites and the Bulk by Molecular Dynamics with Parallel Monte Carlo Water Moves on Graphical Processing Units.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Charles Lin; Brian K Radak; Woody Sherman; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Enhancing sampling of water rehydration upon ligand binding using variants of grand canonical Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Yunhui Ge; Oliver J Melling; Weiming Dong; Jonathan W Essex; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.179

3.  Enhancing Sampling of Water Rehydration on Ligand Binding: A Comparison of Techniques.

Authors:  Yunhui Ge; David C Wych; Marley L Samways; Michael E Wall; Jonathan W Essex; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 6.578

4.  Correction Schemes for Absolute Binding Free Energies Involving Lipid Bilayers.

Authors:  Zhiyi Wu; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.578

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.