Literature DB >> 30218199

Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Xibing He1, Viet H Man1, Beihong Ji1, Xiang-Qun Xie1, Junmei Wang2.   

Abstract

We participated in the Cathepsin S (CatS) sub-challenge of the Drug Design Data Resource (D3R) Grand Challenge 3 (GC3) in 2017 to blindly predict the binding poses of 24 CatS-bound ligands, the binding affinity ranking of 136 ligands, and the binding free energies of a subset of 33 ligands in Stage 1A and Stage 2. Our submitted predictions ranked relatively well compared to the submissions from other participants. Here we present our methodologies used in the challenge. For the binding pose prediction, we employed the Glide module in the Schrodinger Suite 2017 and AutoDock Vina. For the binding affinity/free energy prediction, we carried out molecular dynamics simulations of the complexes in explicit water solvent with counter ions, and then estimated the binding free energies with our newly developed model of extended linear interaction energy (ELIE), which is inspired by two other popular end-point approaches: the linear interaction energy (LIE) method, and the molecular mechanics with Poisson-Boltzmann surface area solvation method (MM/PBSA). Our studies suggest that ELIE is a good trade-off between efficiency and accuracy, and it is appropriate for filling the gap between the high-throughput docking and scoring methods and the rigorous but much more computationally demanding methods like free energy perturbation (FEP) or thermodynamics integration (TI) in computer-aided drug design (CADD) projects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alchemical free energy calculations; Binding affinity; Binding mode; Lead identification; Lead optimization; MM/GBSA; Virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30218199      PMCID: PMC6608581          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0162-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  44 in total

1.  Python: a programming language for software integration and development.

Authors:  M F Sanner
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.518

2.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit Solvent Particle Mesh Ewald.

Authors:  Romelia Salomon-Ferrer; Andreas W Götz; Duncan Poole; Scott Le Grand; Ross C Walker
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 5.  The Future of Cysteine Cathepsins in Disease Management.

Authors:  Lovro Kramer; Dušan Turk; Boris Turk
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 6.  Predicting Binding Free Energies: Frontiers and Benchmarks.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 12.981

7.  Specificity determinants of human cathepsin s revealed by crystal structures of complexes.

Authors:  Thomas A Pauly; Traian Sulea; Mark Ammirati; J Sivaraman; Dennis E Danley; Matthew C Griffor; Ajith V Kamath; I-K Wang; Ellen R Laird; Andrew P Seddon; Robert Ménard; Miroslaw Cygler; Virginia L Rath
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Pyrazole-based cathepsin S inhibitors with arylalkynes as P1 binding elements.

Authors:  Michael K Ameriks; Frank U Axe; Scott D Bembenek; James P Edwards; Yin Gu; Lars Karlsson; Mike Randal; Siquan Sun; Robin L Thurmond; Jian Zhu
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 9.  Cysteine cathepsins: from structure, function and regulation to new frontiers.

Authors:  Vito Turk; Veronika Stoka; Olga Vasiljeva; Miha Renko; Tao Sun; Boris Turk; Dušan Turk
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-10-12

10.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized Born.

Authors:  Andreas W Götz; Mark J Williamson; Dong Xu; Duncan Poole; Scott Le Grand; Ross C Walker
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  9 in total

1.  A fast and high-quality charge model for the next generation general AMBER force field.

Authors:  Xibing He; Viet H Man; Wei Yang; Tai-Sung Lee; Junmei Wang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Docking rigid macrocycles using Convex-PL, AutoDock Vina, and RDKit in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Vladimir Chupin; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Comprehensive evaluation of end-point free energy techniques in carboxylated-pillar[6]arene host-guest binding: I. Standard procedure.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Lei Zheng; Chu Qin; John Z H Zhang; Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.179

4.  D3R grand challenge 4: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies.

Authors:  Conor D Parks; Zied Gaieb; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Chenghua Shao; W Patrick Walters; Johanna M Jansen; Georgia McGaughey; Richard A Lewis; Scott D Bembenek; Michael K Ameriks; Tara Mirzadegan; Stephen K Burley; Rommie E Amaro; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Machine learning on ligand-residue interaction profiles to significantly improve binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Beihong Ji; Xibing He; Jingchen Zhai; Yuzhao Zhang; Viet Hoang Man; Junmei Wang
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  A Comparative Linear Interaction Energy and MM/PBSA Study on SIRT1-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculation.

Authors:  Eko Aditya Rifai; Marc van Dijk; Nico P E Vermeulen; Arry Yanuar; Daan P Geerke
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Correlation of cathepsin S with coronary stenosis degree, carotid thickness, blood pressure, glucose and lipid metabolism and vascular endothelial function in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Shengyang Huang; Yu Cao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Fast, Accurate, and Reliable Protocols for Routine Calculations of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities in Drug Design Projects Using AMBER GPU-TI with ff14SB/GAFF.

Authors:  Xibing He; Shuhan Liu; Tai-Sung Lee; Beihong Ji; Viet H Man; Darrin M York; Junmei Wang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-02-25

9.  How Good is Jarzynski's Equality for Computer-Aided Drug Design?

Authors:  Kiet Ho; Duc Toan Truong; Mai Suan Li
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.991

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.