Literature DB >> 30835999

Simulating Water Exchange to Buried Binding Sites.

Ido Y Ben-Shalom1, Charles Lin2,3, Tom Kurtzman4,5, Ross C Walker2,3, Michael K Gilson1.   

Abstract

Traditional molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of proteins, which relies on integration of Newton's equations of motion, cannot efficiently equilibrate water occupancy for buried cavities in proteins. This leads to slow convergence of thermodynamic averages for such systems. We have addressed this challenge by efficiently integrating standard Metropolis Monte Carlo (MC) translational water moves with MD in the AMBER simulation package. The translational moves allow water to easily enter or exit buried sites in a thermodynamically correct way during a simulation. To maximize efficiency, the algorithm avoids moves that only interchange waters within the bulk around the protein instead focusing on moves that can transfer water between bulk and the protein interior. In addition, a steric grid allows avoidance of moves that would lead to obvious steric clashes, and a fast grid-based energy evaluation is used to reduce the number of expensive full energy calculations. The potential energy distribution produced using MC/MD was found to be statistically indistinguishable from that of control simulations using only MD, and the algorithm effectively equilibrated water across steric barriers and into binding pockets that are not accessible with pure MD. The MC/MD method introduced here should be of increasing utility for applications spanning protein folding, the elucidation of protein mechanisms, and free energy calculations for computer-aided drug design. It is available in version 18 release of the widely disseminated AMBER simulation package.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30835999      PMCID: PMC6456390          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  32 in total

1.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations of water in protein environments.

Authors:  Hyung-June Woo; Aaron R Dinner; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Strong solute-solute dispersive interactions in a protein-ligand complex.

Authors:  Richard Malham; Sarah Johnstone; Richard J Bingham; Elizabeth Barratt; Simon E V Phillips; Charles A Laughton; Steve W Homans
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Tom Young; Robert Abel; Byungchan Kim; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

6.  Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of factor Xa ligand binding.

Authors:  Robert Abel; Tom Young; Ramy Farid; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Computation of binding free energy with molecular dynamics and grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Binding of buried structural water increases the flexibility of proteins.

Authors:  S Fischer; C S Verma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Predicting ligand binding affinity with alchemical free energy methods in a polar model binding site.

Authors:  Sarah E Boyce; David L Mobley; Gabriel J Rocklin; Alan P Graves; Ken A Dill; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Prediction of the water content in protein binding sites.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  11 in total

1.  Dissecting the Energetics of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins via a Hybrid Experimental and Computational Approach.

Authors:  Junjie Zou; Carlos Simmerling; Daniel P Raleigh
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Utilizing Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Methods in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Michael S Bodnarchuk; Martin J Packer; Alexe Haywood
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Fast Equilibration of Water between Buried Sites and the Bulk by Molecular Dynamics with Parallel Monte Carlo Water Moves on Graphical Processing Units.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Charles Lin; Brian K Radak; Woody Sherman; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Comparison of Grand Canonical and Conventional Molecular Dynamics Simulation Methods for Protein-Bound Water Networks.

Authors:  Vilhelm Ekberg; Marley L Samways; Majda Misini Ignjatović; Jonathan W Essex; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  ACS Phys Chem Au       Date:  2022-02-11

6.  Accounting for the Central Role of Interfacial Water in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Zhixiong Lin; Brian K Radak; Charles Lin; Woody Sherman; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Challenges Encountered Applying Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Hannah M Baumann; Vytautas Gapsys; Bert L de Groot; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 8.  Accurate determination of protein:ligand standard binding free energies from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Haohao Fu; Haochuan Chen; Marharyta Blazhynska; Emma Goulard Coderc de Lacam; Florence Szczepaniak; Anna Pavlova; Xueguang Shao; James C Gumbart; François Dehez; Benoît Roux; Wensheng Cai; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 17.021

9.  Protein Matrix Control of Reaction Center Excitation in Photosystem II.

Authors:  Abhishek Sirohiwal; Frank Neese; Dimitrios A Pantazis
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Enhancing water sampling of buried binding sites using nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Nathan M Lim; Sam C Gill; Michael K Gilson; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.