Literature DB >> 28120155

Selective anti-scatter grid removal during coronary angiography and PCI: a simple and safe technique for radiation reduction.

James R Roy1, Philip Sun1, Glenn Ison1, Ananth M Prasan1, Tom Ford1, Andrew Hopkins1,2, David R Ramsay1, James C Weaver3,4.   

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to quantify the radiation dose reduction during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through removal of the anti-scatter grid (ASG), and to assess its impact on image quality in adult patients with a low body mass index (BMI). Methods A phantom with different thicknesses of acrylic was used with a Westmead Test Object to simulate patient sizes and assess image quality. 129 low BMI patients underwent coronary angiography or PCI with or without the ASG in situ. Radiation dose was compared between both patient groups. Results With the same imaging system and a comparable patient population, ASG removal was associated with a 47% reduction in total dose-area product (DAP) (p < 0.001). Peak skin dose was reduced by 54% (p < 0.001). Operator scatter was reduced to a similar degree and was significantly reduced through removal of the ASG. Using an image quality phantom it was demonstrated that image quality remained satisfactory. Conclusions Removal of the ASG is a simple and effective method to significantly reduce radiation dose in coronary angiography and PCI. This was achieved while maintaining adequate diagnostic image quality. Selective removal of the ASG is likely to improve the radiation safety of cardiac angiography and interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28120155     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1067-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  17 in total

1.  Radiation dose reduction without compromise of image quality in cardiac angiography and intervention with the use of a flat panel detector without an antiscatter grid.

Authors:  J Partridge; G McGahan; S Causton; M Bowers; M Mason; M Dalby; A Mitchell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Radiation exposure to patient's skin during percutaneous coronary intervention for various lesions, including chronic total occlusion.

Authors:  Shigeru Suzuki; Shigeru Furui; Hiroshi Kohtake; Naoyuki Yokoyama; Ken Kozuma; Yoshito Yamamoto; Takaaki Isshiki
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.993

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  Assessment of clinical occupational dose reduction effect of a new interventional cardiology shield for radial access combined with a scatter reducing drape.

Authors:  Paddy Gilligan; J Lynch; H Eder; S Maguire; E Fox; B Doyle; I Casserly; H McCann; D Foley
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Guidelines for patient radiation dose management.

Authors:  Michael S Stecker; Stephen Balter; Richard B Towbin; Donald L Miller; Eliseo Vañó; Gabriel Bartal; J Fritz Angle; Christine P Chao; Alan M Cohen; Robert G Dixon; Kathleen Gross; George G Hartnell; Beth Schueler; John D Statler; Thierry de Baère; John F Cardella
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  ALARA and digital imaging systems.

Authors:  Terry R Eastman
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb

7.  Measures to reduce radiation in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Shikhar Agarwal; Akhil Parashar; Stephen G Ellis; Frederick A Heupler; Evan Lau; E Murat Tuzcu; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 6.546

8.  Assessment of fluoroscopic systems with a simple test object.

Authors:  M Ricciardello; D McLean
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.430

Review 9.  Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Charles E Chambers; Kenneth A Fetterly; Ralf Holzer; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; James C Blankenship; Stephen Balter; Warren K Laskey
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Real-time colour pictorial radiation monitoring during coronary angiography: effect on patient peak skin and total dose during coronary angiography.

Authors:  Sharon M Wilson; Ananth M Prasan; Amy Virdi; Marissa Lassere; Glenn Ison; David R Ramsay; James C Weaver
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 6.534

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Removal of Antiscatter Grids for Spinal Digital Subtraction Angiography: Dose Reduction without Loss of Diagnostic Value.

Authors:  Emanuele Orrù; Amgad El Mekabaty; Diego San Millan; Monica S Pearl; Philippe Gailloud
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Estimating radiation exposure during paediatric cardiac catheterisation: a potential for radiation reduction with air gap technique.

Authors:  Reid C Chamberlain; Alexis C Shindhelm; Chu Wang; Gregory A Fleming; Kevin D Hill
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 1.093

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.