Literature DB >> 25097198

Measures to reduce radiation in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Shikhar Agarwal1, Akhil Parashar1, Stephen G Ellis1, Frederick A Heupler1, Evan Lau1, E Murat Tuzcu1, Samir R Kapadia2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: X-ray use in the catheterization laboratory is guided by the principle of as low as reasonably achievable. In accordance with this principle, we reduced the default fluoroscopic frame rate from 10 to 7.5 frames/s and increased the emphasis on the use of low-dose acquisition starting January 1, 2013. We aimed to study the impact of these measures on the total air kerma during diagnostic catheterization (DC) and percutaneous interventions (PCI). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Propensity matching based on age, sex, body surface area, total fluoroscopy time, and total acquisition time was used to select matched patients for 2012 and 2013, further stratified by DC or PCI. The total air kerma was subsequently compared between 2012 and 2013, separately for DC and PCI. Median total air kerma during DC in 2013 was 625 mGy, which was significantly lower than the corresponding values in 2012 (median, 798 mGy; P<0.001). Similarly, median total air kerma during PCI in 2013 was 1675 mGy, which was significantly less than corresponding values in 2012 (median 2463 mGy, P<0.001). On comparison of air kerma rates between corresponding projections in 2 years, we observed a significant reduction in fluoroscopy- and acquisition-based air kerma rates in 2013, after institution of radiation reduction measures in all projections.
CONCLUSIONS: With reduction in the default fluoroscopic frame rate and a greater use of low-dose acquisition, there has been a marked reduction in the total air kerma and air kerma rates for DC and PCI.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ionizing radiation; radiation; radiation effects; radiation protection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25097198     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  13 in total

1.  How Slow Can We Go? 4 Frames Per Second (fps) Versus 7.5 fps Fluoroscopy for Atrial Septal Defects (ASDs) Device Closure.

Authors:  Gurumurthy Hiremath; Jeffery Meadows; Phillip Moore
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  Assessment of environmental and ergonomic hazard associated to printing and photocopying: a review.

Authors:  Abhishek Nandan; N A Siddiqui; Pankaj Kumar
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 3.  Management of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complications.

Authors:  Gregory Means; Christopher End; Prashant Kaul
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-04

Review 4.  Physician and Patient Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Procedures.

Authors:  Andrew M Goldsweig; J Dawn Abbott; Herbert D Aronow
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-02

5.  Towards Robot-Assisted Echocardiographic Monitoring in Catheterization Laboratories : Usability-Centered Manipulator for Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Authors:  Christina Pahl; Henning Ebelt; Mostafa Sayahkarajy; Eko Supriyanto; Amiliana Soesanto
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Simulator training to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Aric Katz; Avraham Shtub; Amir Solomonica; Adva Poliakov; Ariel Roguin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Selective anti-scatter grid removal during coronary angiography and PCI: a simple and safe technique for radiation reduction.

Authors:  James R Roy; Philip Sun; Glenn Ison; Ananth M Prasan; Tom Ford; Andrew Hopkins; David R Ramsay; James C Weaver
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  The use of digital magnification to reduce radiation dose in the cardiac catheter laboratory.

Authors:  Shailesh Dalvi; Hywel Mortimer Roberts; Christopher Bellamy; Michael Rees
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Radiation exposure, the forgotten enemy: Toward implementation of national safety program.

Authors:  Tarek A N Ahmed; Salma Taha
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2016-11-15

Review 10.  Radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Sylvia Marie R Biso; Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.