Literature DB >> 31679554

Estimating radiation exposure during paediatric cardiac catheterisation: a potential for radiation reduction with air gap technique.

Reid C Chamberlain1, Alexis C Shindhelm2, Chu Wang3, Gregory A Fleming1, Kevin D Hill1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The air gap technique (AGT) is an approach to radiation dose optimisation during fluoroscopy where an "air gap" is used in place of an anti-scatter grid to reduce scatter irradiation. The AGT is effective in adults but remains largely untested in children. Effects are expected to vary depending on patient size and the amount of scatter irradiation produced.
METHODS: Fluoroscopy and cineangiography were performed using a Phillips Allura Fluoroscope on tissue simulation anthropomorphic phantoms representing a neonate, 5-year-old, and teenager. Monte Carlo simulations were then used to estimate effective radiation dose first using a standard recommended imaging approach and then repeated using the AGT. Objective image quality assessments were performed using an image quality phantom.
RESULTS: Effective radiation doses for the neonate and 5-year-old phantom increased consistently (2-92%) when the AGT was used compared to the standard recommended imaging approaches in which the anti-scatter grid is removed at baseline. In the teenage phantom, the AGT reduced effective doses by 5-59%, with greater dose reductions for imaging across the greater thoracic dimension of lateral projection. The AGT increased geometric magnification but with no detectable change in image blur or contrast differentiation.
CONCLUSIONS: The AGT is an effective approach for dose reduction in larger patients, particularly for lateral imaging. Compared to the current dose optimisation guidelines, the technique may be harmful in smaller children where scatter irradiation is minimal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Scattering; angiography; congenital; heart defects; radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31679554      PMCID: PMC6937389          DOI: 10.1017/S1047951119002506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol Young        ISSN: 1047-9511            Impact factor:   1.093


  16 in total

1.  Radiation dose reduction without compromise of image quality in cardiac angiography and intervention with the use of a flat panel detector without an antiscatter grid.

Authors:  J Partridge; G McGahan; S Causton; M Bowers; M Mason; M Dalby; A Mitchell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

Review 3.  Ionizing radiation biomarkers in epidemiological studies - An update.

Authors:  Janet Hall; Penny A Jeggo; Catharine West; Maria Gomolka; Roel Quintens; Christophe Badie; Olivier Laurent; An Aerts; Nataša Anastasov; Omid Azimzadeh; Tamara Azizova; Sarah Baatout; Bjorn Baselet; Mohammed A Benotmane; Eric Blanchardon; Yann Guéguen; Siamak Haghdoost; Mats Harms-Ringhdahl; Julia Hess; Michaela Kreuzer; Dominique Laurier; Ellina Macaeva; Grainne Manning; Eileen Pernot; Jean-Luc Ravanat; Laure Sabatier; Karine Tack; Soile Tapio; Horst Zitzelsberger; Elisabeth Cardis
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 5.657

4.  Influence of the antiscatter grid on dose and image quality in pediatric interventional cardiology X-ray systems.

Authors:  Carlos Ubeda; Eliseo Vano; Luciano Gonzalez; Patricia Miranda
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Effective doses to patients from paediatric cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  J Rassow; A A Schmaltz; F Hentrich; C Streffer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Removal of scatter radiation in paediatric cardiac catheterisation: a randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Richard Gould; Sonyia L McFadden; Andrew J Sands; Brian A McCrossan; Simon Horn; Kevin M Prise; Philip Doyle; Ciara M Hughes
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.394

7.  Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimation in children with heart disease.

Authors:  Jason N Johnson; Christoph P Hornik; Jennifer S Li; Daniel K Benjamin; Terry T Yoshizumi; Robert E Reiman; Donald P Frush; Kevin D Hill
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Impact of imaging approach on radiation dose and associated cancer risk in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Kevin D Hill; Chu Wang; Andrew J Einstein; Natalie Januzis; Giao Nguyen; Jennifer S Li; Gregory A Fleming; Terry K Yoshizumi
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Radiation dosage during pediatric diagnostic or interventional cardiac catheterizations using the "air gap technique" and an aggressive "as low as reasonably achievable" radiation reduction protocol in patients weighing <20 kg.

Authors:  Frank A Osei; Joshua Hayman; Nicole J Sutton; Robert H Pass
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

Review 10.  Radiation Safety in Children With Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: A Scientific Position Statement on Multimodality Dose Optimization From the Image Gently Alliance.

Authors:  Kevin D Hill; Donald P Frush; B Kelly Han; Brian G Abbott; Aimee K Armstrong; Robert A DeKemp; Andrew C Glatz; S Bruce Greenberg; Alexander Sheldon Herbert; Henri Justino; Douglas Mah; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Cynthia K Rigsby; Timothy C Slesnick; Keith J Strauss; Sigal Trattner; Mohan N Viswanathan; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.