Literature DB >> 16159965

Radiation dose reduction without compromise of image quality in cardiac angiography and intervention with the use of a flat panel detector without an antiscatter grid.

J Partridge1, G McGahan, S Causton, M Bowers, M Mason, M Dalby, A Mitchell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that replacing the antiscatter grid with an air gap will reduce patient radiation exposure without significant compromise of image quality.
METHODS: 457 patients having either uncomplicated diagnostic studies or a single vessel angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)) on a flat plate system (GE Innova) were studied. For two months their total dose-area product score was recorded on standard gridded images and then for two months on images made with the grid out, with an air gap used to reduce scatter. Detector magnification was reduced one step when an air gap was used to achieve the same final image size. A sample set of studies was reviewed blind by five observers, who scored sharpness and contrast on a non-linear scale.
RESULTS: The average dose-area product was significantly reduced, both in the diagnostic group (n = 276), from a mean (SD) of 26.2 (14.7) Gy.cm2 with the grid in to 16.1 (12) Gy.cm2 with the grid out (p = 0.01), and in the PTCA group (n = 181), from 48.2 (36.2) to 37 (27.5) (p = 0.01). The mean image quality scores of the gridless cohort were not significantly different from those of the gridded cohort.
CONCLUSION: With the use of a flat plate detector, air gap gridless angiography reduces the radiation dose to the patient and, in consequence, to the operator without significantly affecting image quality. It is proposed that gridless imaging should be the default technique for adults and children and in most installations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16159965      PMCID: PMC1860862          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2005.063909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  6 in total

1.  Variability of radiation output dynamic range in modern cardiac catheterization imaging systems.

Authors:  D R Holmes; M Wondrow; R Stueve; D Grill; R T Kasson; J Popma; W Laskey
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1998-08

Review 2.  Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  2002-03

3.  Radiation exposure and efficacy of exposure-reduction techniques during cardiac catheterization in children.

Authors:  B A Schueler; P R Julsrud; J E Gray; J G Stears; K Y Wu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Fluoroscopy without the grid: a method of reducing the radiation dose.

Authors:  P Drury; A Robinson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Effective techniques for reduction of radiation dosage to patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures.

Authors:  E Kuon; C Glaser; J B Dahm
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Optimization of radiographic parameters for paediatric cardiac angiography.

Authors:  D G W Onnasch; A Schemm; H-H Kramer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.039

  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children.

Authors:  Meike Weis; Claudia Hagelstein; Theo Diehm; Stefan O Schoenberg; K Wolfgang Neff
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-02

2.  Intraoperative Completion Angiogram May Be Superior to Transesophageal Echocardiogram for Detection of Pulmonary Artery Residual Lesions in Congenital Heart Surgery.

Authors:  Luke Lamers; Erick E Jimenez; Catherine Allen; Derreck Hoyme; Entela Bua Lushaj; Petros V Anagnostopoulos
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Removal of Antiscatter Grids for Spinal Digital Subtraction Angiography: Dose Reduction without Loss of Diagnostic Value.

Authors:  Emanuele Orrù; Amgad El Mekabaty; Diego San Millan; Monica S Pearl; Philippe Gailloud
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Selective anti-scatter grid removal during coronary angiography and PCI: a simple and safe technique for radiation reduction.

Authors:  James R Roy; Philip Sun; Glenn Ison; Ananth M Prasan; Tom Ford; Andrew Hopkins; David R Ramsay; James C Weaver
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Radiation Reduction Capabilities of a Next-Generation Pediatric Imaging Platform.

Authors:  Luke J Lamers; Martine Moran; Jenna N Torgeson; John S Hokanson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  The Importance of Benchmark Radiation.

Authors:  Luiz Alberto Alberto Christiani
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Radiation dosage during pediatric diagnostic or interventional cardiac catheterizations using the "air gap technique" and an aggressive "as low as reasonably achievable" radiation reduction protocol in patients weighing <20 kg.

Authors:  Frank A Osei; Joshua Hayman; Nicole J Sutton; Robert H Pass
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

8.  Comparison of pediatric radiation dose and vessel visibility on angiographic systems using piglets as a surrogate: antiscatter grid removal vs. lower detector air kerma settings with a grid - a preclinical investigation.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss; John M Racadio; Todd A Abruzzo; Neil D Johnson; Manish N Patel; Kamlesh U Kukreja; Mark J H den Hartog; Bart P A Hoonaert; Rami A Nachabe
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Estimating radiation exposure during paediatric cardiac catheterisation: a potential for radiation reduction with air gap technique.

Authors:  Reid C Chamberlain; Alexis C Shindhelm; Chu Wang; Gregory A Fleming; Kevin D Hill
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 1.093

Review 10.  Radiation Safety in Children With Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: A Scientific Position Statement on Multimodality Dose Optimization From the Image Gently Alliance.

Authors:  Kevin D Hill; Donald P Frush; B Kelly Han; Brian G Abbott; Aimee K Armstrong; Robert A DeKemp; Andrew C Glatz; S Bruce Greenberg; Alexander Sheldon Herbert; Henri Justino; Douglas Mah; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Cynthia K Rigsby; Timothy C Slesnick; Keith J Strauss; Sigal Trattner; Mohan N Viswanathan; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.