Literature DB >> 32125257

Removal of Antiscatter Grids for Spinal Digital Subtraction Angiography: Dose Reduction without Loss of Diagnostic Value.

Emanuele Orrù1, Amgad El Mekabaty1, Diego San Millan1, Monica S Pearl1, Philippe Gailloud1.   

Abstract

Background Spinal digital subtraction angiography (DSA) exposes patients and operators to substantial amounts of radiation. Antiscatter grid (ASG) removal is used to decrease radiation exposure but may reduce image quality. Purpose To determine whether ASG removal during spinal DSA in adults reduces radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality and whether dose reduction is related to body mass index (BMI). Materials and Methods This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective study included adults undergoing spinal DSA between January and December 2016. Each procedure included an additional angiographic acquisition performed twice, once with and once without ASG, either documenting the artery of Adamkiewicz (no pathology group) or the condition leading to the procedure (pathology group). Dose differences between study acquisitions and the influence of BMI were evaluated via paired t test. Two neurointerventionalists blinded to acquisition protocols were asked to independently evaluate a sample of 40 study acquisitions (20 with ASG, 20 without ASG) from 20 randomly selected participants to (a) rate image quality, (b) categorize findings, and (c) determine whether images had been obtained with or without ASG. Percentage agreement on image quality, findings categorization, and ability to correctly identify the acquisition protocol was calculated for both readers. Results Fifty-three participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 51 years ± 15.2; 32 men) were evaluated. ASG removal reduced the mean dose per acquisition by approximately 33% (mean dose-area product and air kerma decreased from 202 to 135.6 µGy/m2 and from 35.3 to 24 mGy, respectively; P < .001) independently of BMI (P = .3). Both readers evaluated all images (40 of 40) as being of diagnostic quality and correctly categorized findings in 19 of 20 (95%) cases. Overall percentage agreement for correct protocol identification was 60% (12 of 20) for grid-in and 45% (nine of 20) for grid-out images. Conclusion Antiscatter grid removal during spinal digital subtraction angiography decreased participants' radiation exposure while preserving diagnostic image quality. © RSNA, 2020.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32125257      PMCID: PMC7192568          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  33 in total

1.  Radiation dose reduction without compromise of image quality in cardiac angiography and intervention with the use of a flat panel detector without an antiscatter grid.

Authors:  J Partridge; G McGahan; S Causton; M Bowers; M Mason; M Dalby; A Mitchell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  MDCT angiography of the spinal vasculature and the artery of Adamkiewicz.

Authors:  Daniel T Boll; Hubertus Bulow; Kristine A Blackham; Andrik J Aschoff; Bernd L Schmitz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  Radiation risk reduction in cardiac electrophysiology through use of a gridless imaging technique.

Authors:  Ian R Smith; Wayne J Stafford; John R Hayes; Michael C Adsett; Kieran M Dauber; John T Rivers
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Reducing Radiation Dose for High-resolution Flat-panel CT Imaging of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

Authors:  Amgad El Mekabaty; Seth E Pross; Mesha Martinez; John P Carey; Monica S Pearl
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Practical techniques for reducing radiation exposure during cerebral angiography procedures.

Authors:  Monica S Pearl; Collin Torok; Jiangxia Wang; Emily Wyse; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Philippe Gailloud
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 7.  Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures.

Authors:  L K Wagner; P J Eifel; R A Geise
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Coronary artery caliber in normal children and patients with Kawasaki disease but without aneurysms: an echocardiographic and angiographic study.

Authors:  K Arjunan; S R Daniels; R A Meyer; D C Schwartz; H Barron; S Kaplan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Radiation dose reduction during neurointerventional procedures by modification of default settings on biplane angiography equipment.

Authors:  Elyne N Kahn; Joseph J Gemmete; Neeraj Chaudhary; Byron Gregory Thompson; Kevin Chen; Emmanuel G Christodoulou; Aditya S Pandey
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 10.  Radiation Safety in Children With Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: A Scientific Position Statement on Multimodality Dose Optimization From the Image Gently Alliance.

Authors:  Kevin D Hill; Donald P Frush; B Kelly Han; Brian G Abbott; Aimee K Armstrong; Robert A DeKemp; Andrew C Glatz; S Bruce Greenberg; Alexander Sheldon Herbert; Henri Justino; Douglas Mah; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Cynthia K Rigsby; Timothy C Slesnick; Keith J Strauss; Sigal Trattner; Mohan N Viswanathan; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-05-18
View more
  1 in total

1.  Radiation Dose and Fluoroscopy Time of Diagnostic Angiography in Patients with Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula.

Authors:  Yigit Ozpeynirci; Christoph Trumm; Robert Stahl; David Fischer; Thomas Liebig; Robert Forbrig
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.156

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.