Literature DB >> 31758202

Novel strategies for genomic prediction of untested single-cross maize hybrids using unbalanced historical data.

K O G Dias1, H P Piepho2, L J M Guimarães3, P E O Guimarães3, S N Parentoni3, M O Pinto3, R W Noda3, J V Magalhães3, C T Guimarães3, A A F Garcia4, M M Pastina5.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Weighted outperformed unweighted genomic prediction using an unbalanced dataset representative of a commercial breeding program. Moreover, the use of the two cycles preceding predictions as training set achieved optimal prediction ability. Predicting the performance of untested single-cross hybrids through genomic prediction (GP) is highly desirable to increase genetic gain. Here, we evaluate the predictive ability (PA) of novel genomic strategies to predict single-cross maize hybrids using an unbalanced historical dataset of a tropical breeding program. Field data comprised 949 single-cross hybrids evaluated from 2006 to 2013, representing eight breeding cycles. Hybrid genotypes were inferred based on their parents' genotypes (inbred lines) using single-nucleotide polymorphism markers obtained via genotyping-by-sequencing. GP analyses were fitted using genomic best linear unbiased prediction via a stage-wise approach, considering two distinct cross-validation schemes. Results highlight the importance of taking into account the uncertainty regarding the adjusted means at each step of a stage-wise analysis, due to the highly unbalanced data structure and the expected heterogeneity of variances across years and locations of a commercial breeding program. Further, an increase in the size of the training set was not always advantageous even in the same breeding program. The use of the two cycles preceding predictions achieved optimal PA of untested single-cross hybrids in a forward prediction scenario, which could be used to replace the first step of field screening. Finally, in addition to the practical and theoretical results applied to maize hybrid breeding programs, the stage-wise analysis performed in this study may be applied to any crop historical unbalanced data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31758202     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-019-03475-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  39 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Gustavo de los Campos; William G Hill; Eduardo Manfredi; Rohan Fernando
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Optimal Designs for Genomic Selection in Hybrid Crops.

Authors:  Tingting Guo; Xiaoqing Yu; Xianran Li; Haozhe Zhang; Chengsong Zhu; Sherry Flint-Garcia; Michael D McMullen; James B Holland; Stephen J Szalma; Randall J Wisser; Jianming Yu
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 13.164

4.  Comparisons of single-stage and two-stage approaches to genomic selection.

Authors:  Torben Schulz-Streeck; Joseph O Ogutu; Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction.

Authors:  David Habier; Rohan L Fernando; Dorian J Garrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives.

Authors:  José Crossa; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Jaime Cuevas; Osval Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquín; Gustavo de Los Campos; Juan Burgueño; Juan M González-Camacho; Sergio Pérez-Elizalde; Yoseph Beyene; Susanne Dreisigacker; Ravi Singh; Xuecai Zhang; Manje Gowda; Manish Roorkiwal; Jessica Rutkoski; Rajeev K Varshney
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 18.313

7.  Efficiency of genomic prediction of non-assessed single crosses.

Authors:  José Marcelo Soriano Viana; Helcio Duarte Pereira; Gabriel Borges Mundim; Hans-Peter Piepho; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species.

Authors:  Robert J Elshire; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Qi Sun; Jesse A Poland; Ken Kawamoto; Edward S Buckler; Sharon E Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Optimal cross selection for long-term genetic gain in two-part programs with rapid recurrent genomic selection.

Authors:  Gregor Gorjanc; R Chris Gaynor; John M Hickey
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses.

Authors:  Dorian J Garrick; Jeremy F Taylor; Rohan L Fernando
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  4 in total

1.  Leveraging probability concepts for cultivar recommendation in multi-environment trials.

Authors:  Kaio O G Dias; Jhonathan P R Dos Santos; Matheus D Krause; Hans-Peter Piepho; Lauro J M Guimarães; Maria M Pastina; Antonio A F Garcia
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in an Allogamous Annual Crop: The Case of Maize Single-Cross Hybrids.

Authors:  Isadora Cristina Martins Oliveira; Arthur Bernardeli; José Henrique Soler Guilhen; Maria Marta Pastina
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 3.  Heterosis and Hybrid Crop Breeding: A Multidisciplinary Review.

Authors:  Marlee R Labroo; Anthony J Studer; Jessica E Rutkoski
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Phenotypic and molecular characterization of a set of tropical maize inbred lines from a public breeding program in Brazil.

Authors:  Sirlene Viana de Faria; Leandro Tonello Zuffo; Wemerson Mendonça Rezende; Diego Gonçalves Caixeta; Hélcio Duarte Pereira; Camila Ferreira Azevedo; Rodrigo Oliveira DeLima
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.969

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.