| Literature DB >> 24280183 |
Nonoy Bandillo1, Chitra Raghavan, Pauline Andrea Muyco, Ma Anna Lynn Sevilla, Irish T Lobina, Christine Jade Dilla-Ermita, Chih-Wei Tung, Susan McCouch, Michael Thomson, Ramil Mauleon, Rakesh Kumar Singh, Glenn Gregorio, Edilberto Redoña, Hei Leung.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This article describes the development of Multi-parent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross populations (MAGIC) in rice and discusses potential applications for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and for rice varietal development. We have developed 4 multi-parent populations: indica MAGIC (8 indica parents); MAGIC plus (8 indica parents with two additional rounds of 8-way F1 inter-crossing); japonica MAGIC (8 japonica parents); and Global MAGIC (16 parents - 8 indica and 8 japonica). The parents used in creating these populations are improved varieties with desirable traits for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance, yield, and grain quality. The purpose is to fine map QTLs for multiple traits and to directly and indirectly use the highly recombined lines in breeding programs. These MAGIC populations provide a useful germplasm resource with diverse allelic combinations to be exploited by the rice community.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24280183 PMCID: PMC4883706 DOI: 10.1186/1939-8433-6-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
Figure 1Crossing schemes to produce four multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations: a) Development of the MAGIC population. The same scheme was used for the development of the japonica MAGIC population b) Development of the MAGIC plus and global MAGIC populations. The global population includes eight indica and eight japonica founder lines, which carry QTLs conferring tolerance of biotic and abiotic stresses. A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H – represent the 8 indica parents; I, J, K, L, M, N, O and P – represent the 8 japonica parents; Gen- generation; SSDM – single seed descent method ,S – selfing.
Agronomic relevance of the 16 founder lines used in developing the and MAGIC populations
| Germplasm/variety | GID1 | Varietal type | Origin | Agronomic relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Fedearroz 50 | 1846419 |
| Colombia | Popular variety in several countries, with stay green/delayed senescence & quality traits, disease tolerance, progenitor of many breeding lines |
| Shan-Huang Zhan-2 (SHZ-2) | 402862 |
| China | Blast resistant, high yielding; in the pedigrees of many varieties in south China |
| IR64633-87-2-2-3-3 (PSBRc82) | 94801 |
| IRRI | High yielding and most popular variety of the Philippines |
| IR77186-122-2-2-3 (PSBRc 158) | 1111266 | IRRI | High yielding variety in New Plant Type II background | |
| IR77298-14-1-2-10 | 2154106 |
| IRRI | Drought tolerant in lowlands with IR64 background and tungro resistance |
| IR4630-22-2-5-1-3 | 56023 |
| IRRI | Good plant type, salt tolerant at seedling and reproductive stages |
| IR45427-2B-2-2B-1-1 | 1935108 |
| IRRI | Fe toxicity tolerant |
| Sambha Mahsuri + Sub1 | 2254836 |
| IRRI | Mega variety with wide compatibility, good grain quality and submergence tolerance |
|
| ||||
| CSR 30 | 1158955 | Basmati group | India | Sodicity tolerance; Basmati type long aromatic grain |
| Cypress | 417083 | Tropical japonica | USA | High yielding, good grain quality and cold tolerant |
| IAC 165 | 599974 | Tropical japonica | Latin America | Aerobic rice adaptation |
| Jinbubyeo | 312160 | Temperate japonica | Korea | High yielding and cold tolerant |
| WAB 56-125 | 94428 | O. glaberrima in | WARDA | NERICA background |
| IR73571-3B-11-3-K2 | 2007669 | Cross between tropical japonica and indica | IRRI-Korea project | Tongil type, salinity tolerant |
| Inia Tacuari | 1846418 | Tropical japonica | Uruguay | With earliness, wide adaptation, & good grain quality |
| Colombia XXI | 2351848 | Tropical japonica | Colombia | High yielding and delayed senescence |
1GID, Germplasm identification.
Figure 2Cladogram (neighbor joining) of the 200 S4 MAGIC lines and 8 founders using 634 SNP marker sites (no missing calls or heterozygous sites).
Figure 3Blast disease - Manhattan plot (MLM) showing GWA and highlighting significant associations near previously detected QTLs on chromosomes 2, 3, 9 and 10; x axis – position on chromosomes 1 to 12; y-axis (-) Log p-value of markers; solid line – p < 0.0001.
Figure 4Bacterial blight - Manhattan plots (MLM) showing GWA to bacterial blight strains (a) PXO61, (b) PXO341, (c) PXO86, and (d) PXO99. Note the high level of association with SNPs on chromosome 11 (figures a and b) pointing to Xa4 and xa5 on chromosome 5 (figure c). GWAS detects both Xa4 and xa5 (figure d) in response to PXO99. x axis – position on chromosomes 1 to 12; y-axis (-) Log p-value of markers; solid line – p < 0.0001.
Figure 5Abiotic stress - Manhattan plots (MLM) showing GWA to (a) salt tolerance and (b) submergence. Note the association on chromosome 1 - Saltol to salt tolerance and detection of the SUB1 locus on chromosome 9 in response to submergence. x axis – position on chromosomes 1 to 12; y-axis (-) Log p-value of markers; solid line – p < 0.0001.
Figure 6Grain quality - Manhattan plots (MLM) showing GWA for (a) amylose content – chromosome 6 (b) grain length GS3 on chromosome 3 (c) grain width GB* QTL for grain breadth Ref. Redoña and Mackill (1998) on chromosomes 7 and (d) gelatinization temperature SSIIa Chromosome 6. x axis – position on chromosomes 1 to 12; y-axis (-) Log p-value of markers; solid line – p < 0.0001.
Examples of MAGIC S4 lines exhibiting combination of traits
| S4 Designation | Bacterial blight strains | Blast2 | Submergence tolerance (SES3) | Salt tolerance (SES3) | Grain length (mm) | Grain width (mm) | Amylose content (% by wt) | Gelatinisation temperature (DSC4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PXO611 | PXO861 | PXO991 | PXO3411 | ||||||||
|
| MR | MS | S | MR | R | 1 | 7 | 6.63 | 2.25 | 25.6 | 76.13 |
|
| R | MS | MS | R | R | 5 | 3 | 6.55 | 2.24 | 25.3 | 76.4 |
|
| R | MS | S | R | S | 1 | 7 | 6.58 | 2.14 | 25.7 | 76.6 |
|
| MR | MS | MS | MR | R | 1 | 7 | 6.24 | 2.07 | 23.8 | 76.61 |
|
| MR | MS | MS | MR | R | 5 | 7 | 6.98 | 1.88 | 23.8 | 76.83 |
|
| R | MS | MS | MR | R | 1 | 7 | 6.4 | 1.83 | 23 | 77.28 |
|
| MR | MS | MS | MR | R | 5 | 5 | 5.57 | 1.93 | 23.5 | 76.64 |
|
| MR | MS | MS | MR | R | 1 | 5 | 6.22 | 1.91 | 21.7 | 76.94 |
|
| R | MS | MS | R | R | 1 | 7 | 5.55 | 2.34 | 22.2 | 76.82 |
| R | R | MR | R | R | 1 | 5 | 5.59 | 2.37 | 26.4 | 69.03 | |
| MR | MS | S | R | R | 5 | 7 | 6.2 | 2.18 | 21.8 | 77.39 | |
| R | R | MR | R | R | 1 | 7 | 5.71 | 2.33 | 23.1 | 67.43 | |
| R | MS | MS | R | R | 5 | 7 | 5.72 | 2.32 | 25.2 | 76.31 | |
| R | MS | MS | R | R | 1 | 7 | 5.41 | 2.32 | 26.7 | 68.73 | |
| MR | MS | MS | MR | R | 5 | 7 | 6.65 | 2.36 | 24.1 | 76.14 | |
| R | S | S | MR | R | 1 | 7 | 6.63 | 2.19 | 24.2 | 67.85 | |
| R | MS | MS | R | R | 5 | 3 | 6.85 | 2.25 | 22.4 | 76.7 | |
| R | MS | MS | R | S | 5 | 7 | 6.29 | 2.08 | 25.1 | 75.83 | |
| R | R | MR | R | R | 5 | 7 | 6.15 | 2.2 | 26.3 | 68.06 | |
| R | MS | S | MR | R | 1 | 7 | 6.39 | 2.12 | 23.5 | 79.69 | |
1 Reaction to bacterial blight strains, R, Resistant; MR, Moderately resistance; MS, Moderately susceptible; S, Susceptible.
2Under field condition.
3SES, Standard Evaluation System.
4DSC, Differential Scanning Calorimetry.