Literature DB >> 27909837

Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Wei Dong1,2.   

Abstract

Sound energy propagates in the cochlea through a forward-traveling or slow wave supported by the cochlear partition and fluid inertia. Additionally, cochlear models support traveling wave propagation in the reverse direction as the expected mechanism for conveying otoacoustic emissions out of the cochlea. Recently, however, this hypothesis has been questioned, casting doubt on the process by which otoacoustic emissions travel back out through the cochlea. The proposed alternative reverse travel path for emissions is directly through the fluids of the cochlea as a compression pressure in the form of a fast wave. In the present study, a custom-made micro-pressure sensor was used in vivo in the gerbil cochlea to map two-tone-evoked pressure responses at distinct longitudinal and vertical locations in both the scala tympani and scala vestibuli. Analyses of the magnitude and phase of intracochlear pressure responses at the primary tone and distortion product frequencies were used to distinguish between fast and slow waves in both the forward- and reverse-propagation directions. Results demonstrated that distortion products may travel in both forward and reverse directions post-generation and the existence of both traveling and compression waves. The forward-traveling component appeared to duplicate the process of any external tone, tuned to the local characteristic-frequency place, as it increased compressively and nonlinearly with primary-tone levels. A compression wave was evidenced at frequencies above the cutoff of the recording site. In the opposite direction, a reverse-traveling wave played the major role in driving the stapes reversely and contributed to the distortion product otoacoustic emission. The compression wave may also play a role in reverse propagation when distortion products are generated at a region close to the stapes.

Keywords:  cochlear fluids; cochlear mechanics; compression wave; distortion products; hearing; otoacoustic emissions; traveling wave

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27909837      PMCID: PMC5352610          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0602-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  59 in total

1.  Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. I. Fine structure and higher-order DPOAE as a function of the frequency ratio f2/f1.

Authors:  M Mauermann; S Uppenkamp; P W van Hengel; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation.

Authors:  R Kalluri; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Fast reverse propagation of sound in the living cochlea.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Anders Fridberger; Edward Porsov; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Intracochlear Scala Media Pressure Measurement: Implications for Models of Cochlear Mechanics.

Authors:  Sushrut S Kale; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sensitive developmental periods for kanamycin ototoxic effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  C M Henley; R A Weatherly; G K Martin; B Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.

Authors:  J H Siegel; D O Kim; C E Molnar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations.

Authors:  D O Kim
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The cochlear place-frequency map of the adult and developing Mongolian gerbil.

Authors:  M Müller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  4 in total

1.  Forward and Reverse Waves: Modeling Distortion Products in the Intracochlear Fluid Pressure.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Glenna Stomackin; Xiaohui Lin; Glen K Martin; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Forward and Reverse Middle Ear Transmission in Gerbil with a Normal or Spontaneously Healed Tympanic Membrane.

Authors:  Xiaohui Lin; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Glenna Stomackin; Timothy T Jung; Glen K Martin; Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-16

4.  Intracochlear distortion products are broadly generated by outer hair cells but their contributions to otoacoustic emissions are spatially restricted.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Haiqi Wen; Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Wei Dong; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.