Literature DB >> 2187725

The clinical utility of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

B L Lonsbury-Martin1, G K Martin.   

Abstract

Otoacoustic emissions permit, for the first time, an unbiased means of examining the preneural elements of the peripheral auditory pathway that make the initial contribution to the perception of acoustic stimuli. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) represent one type of evoked emission that has significant potential for becoming an important test in the audiometric evaluation of hearing capacity. In the present review, selected examples of several forms of sensorineural hearing loss demonstrate that DPOAEs have the ability to act as objective indicators of the frequency/level configuration of the conventional audiogram in cases in which hearing impairment results primarily from damage to the outer hair cells. In contrast, normal DPOAE functioning, in the presence of a significant hearing loss, indicates a locus of damage central to the region of the outer hair cells. Like the other emitted responses, DPOAEs can be measured noninvasively, are highly repeatable, under test-retest conditions, and are simple and rapid to detect using microcomputer-based instrumentation. Further, DPOAEs test both the "threshold" and suprathreshold levels of outer hair-cell activity in the form of response/growth functions, over a 30- to 40-dB stimulus range. In combination, these attributes indicate that DPOAEs can provide an objective and comprehensive assessment of the cochlear reserve of a given ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2187725     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199004000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  42 in total

1.  Otoacoustic emissions without somatic motility: can stereocilia mechanics drive the mammalian cochlea?

Authors:  M C Liberman; Jian Zuo; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fast reverse propagation of sound in the living cochlea.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Anders Fridberger; Edward Porsov; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in term infants after hypoxia-ischaemia.

Authors:  Ze Dong Jiang; Zheng Zhang; Andrew Robert Wilkinson
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Evaluation of hearing loss after spinal anesthesia with otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Erkan Karatas; Sitki Göksu; Cengiz Durucu; Yasemin Isik; Muzaffer Kanlikama
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Comparison of compound action potential audiograms with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in experimentally induced hydrops.

Authors:  K C Horner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sound pressure distribution within human ear canals: II. Reverse mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Glenna Stomackin; Xiaohui Lin; Glen K Martin; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Neurophysiologic measures of auditory function in fish consumers: associations with long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and methylmercury.

Authors:  Adam C Dziorny; Mark S Orlando; J J Strain; Philip W Davidson; Gary J Myers
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.294

10.  Developmental exposure to PCBs, MeHg, or both: long-term effects on auditory function.

Authors:  Brian E Powers; Emily Poon; Helen J K Sable; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.