Literature DB >> 33591494

Forward and Reverse Middle Ear Transmission in Gerbil with a Normal or Spontaneously Healed Tympanic Membrane.

Xiaohui Lin1, Sebastiaan W F Meenderink1, Glenna Stomackin1, Timothy T Jung1,2, Glen K Martin1,2, Wei Dong3,4.   

Abstract

Tympanic membranes (TM) that have healed spontaneously after perforation present abnormalities in their structural and mechanical properties; i.e., they are thickened and abnormally dense. These changes result in a deterioration of middle ear (ME) sound transmission, which is clinically presented as a conductive hearing loss (CHL). To fully understand the ME sound transmission under TM pathological conditions, we created a gerbil model with a controlled 50% pars tensa perforation, which was left to heal spontaneously for up to 4 weeks (TM perforations had fully sealed after 2 weeks). After the recovery period, the ME sound transmission, both in the forward and reverse directions, was directly measured with two-tone stimulation. Measurements were performed at the input, the ossicular chain, and output of the ME system, i.e., at the TM, umbo, and scala vestibuli (SV) next to the stapes. We found that variations in ME transmission in forward and reverse directions were not symmetric. In the forward direction, the ME pressure gain decreased in a frequency-dependent manner, with smaller loss (within 10 dB) at low frequencies and more dramatic loss at high frequency regions. The loss pattern was mainly from the less efficient acoustical to mechanical coupling between the TM and umbo, with little changes along the ossicular chain. In the reverse direction, the variations in these ears are relatively smaller. Our results provide detailed functional observations that explain CHL seen in clinical patients with abnormal TM, e.g., caused by otitis media, that have healed spontaneously after perforation or post-tympanoplasty, especially at high frequencies. In addition, our data demonstrate that changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) result from altered ME transmission in both the forward and reverse direction by a reduction of the effective stimulus levels and less efficient transfer of DPs from the ME into the ear canal. This confirms that DPOAEs can be used to assess both the health of the cochlea and the middle ear.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conductive hearing loss; middle ear pressure gain; middle ear pressure loss; middle ear transmission; otoacoustic emission; spontaneously healed tympanic membrane

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33591494      PMCID: PMC8110653          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00779-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  67 in total

1.  How do tympanic-membrane perforations affect human middle-ear sound transmission?

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Measurements of middle-ear function in the Mongolian gerbil, a specialized mammalian ear.

Authors:  J J Rosowski; M E Ravicz; S W Teoh; D Flandermeyer
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1999 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Hearing sensitivity of the mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatis.

Authors:  A Ryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of tympanic membrane perforation on middle ear transmission in gerbil.

Authors:  Glenna Stomackin; Stephanie Kidd; Timothy T Jung; Glen K Martin; Wei Dong
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Cartilage and Fascia Graft In Type 1 Tympanoplasty: Comparison of Anatomical and Audological Results.

Authors:  Bellakhdhar Mouna; Mouna Khalifa; Monia Ghammem; Manel Limam; Abir Meherzi; Wassim Kermani; Mohamed Abdelkefi
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Full-field thickness distribution of human tympanic membrane obtained with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Sam Van der Jeught; Joris J J Dirckx; Johan R M Aerts; Adrian Bradu; Adrian G H Podoleanu; Jan A N Buytaert
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-15

7.  Tympanic membrane. Electron microscopic observation. I: pars tensa.

Authors:  D J Lim
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Functional correlations of tympanic membrane perforation size.

Authors:  Bob Lerut; Alain Pfammatter; Johnny Moons; Thomas Linder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of the Human Tympanic Membrane and Its Influence on the Dynamic Behaviour of the Human Hearing System.

Authors:  L Caminos; J Garcia-Manrique; A Lima-Rodriguez; A Gonzalez-Herrera
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.