Literature DB >> 7410234

Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations.

D O Kim.   

Abstract

Implications of the spatial distribution of distortion products (2f1--f2) and (f2--f1) observed from populations of cochlear nerve fibers for cochlear mechanics are reviewed (the terms f1 and f2 represent the primary stimulus frequencies; f1 < f2). Characteristics of the distortion products (2f1--f2) and (f2--f1) in the ear-canal sound pressure of the cat and the chinchilla are investigated. Physiological origin of the acoustic distortion product (2f1--f2) is supported by demonstrations of the vulnerability of the distortion product to anoxia, to overstimulation and to cyanide perfusion of the cochlea. Observations are presented describing the dependence of levels of acoustic distortion products (2f1--f2) and (f2--f1): (1) on primary levels; (2) on f2 with iso-f1; and (3) on f1 and f2 with iso-(2f1--f2). Observations and interpretations are discussed in support of the conclusions: (1) that the distortion product (2f1--f2) in the ear-canal sound pressure observed in our studies is not generated in the experimental apparatus, in the eardrum, or in the middle ear but in the primary-frequency region of the cochlea; (2) that the distortion-product generation requires normal physiological processes in the cochlear sensory apparatus but not the neural activity; and (3) that the distortion-product is mechanically propagated from the generation region in the cochlea toward the distortion-frequency place and toward the stapes, through the middle ear, and into the ear canal involving gross motions of the cochlear partition and the middle-ear ossicles. It is now inevitable that we accept the notion that, in a normal ear, manifestations of significant nonlinear behavior are present in the mechanical response of the middle ear and the cochlea at most of the physiologically normal sound pressure levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7410234     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(80)90064-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  33 in total

1.  Recent advances in the hearing assessment of children.

Authors:  B Katbamna; D R Patel
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  On ringing limits of the auditory periphery.

Authors:  E de Boer; C Kruidenier
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Accuracy of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions-based ototoxicity monitoring using various primary frequency step-sizes.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 4.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Detailed f1, f2 area study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the frog.

Authors:  Sebastiaan W F Meenderink; Peter M Narins; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

6.  Long-term effects of acoustic trauma on electrically evoked otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Kirin Halsey; Karen Fegelman; Yehoash Raphael; Karl Grosh; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

7.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions measured as vibration on the eardrum of human subjects.

Authors:  E Dalhoff; D Turcanu; H-P Zenner; A W Gummer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Steep and shallow phase gradient distortion product otoacoustic emissions arising basal to the primary tones.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Paul F Fahey; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Srikanta K Mishra; Tracy L Williams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.