Literature DB >> 26682824

Intracochlear Scala Media Pressure Measurement: Implications for Models of Cochlear Mechanics.

Sushrut S Kale1, Elizabeth S Olson2.   

Abstract

Models of the active cochlea build upon the underlying passive mechanics. Passive cochlear mechanics is based on physical and geometrical properties of the cochlea and the fluid-tissue interaction between the cochlear partition and the surrounding fluid. Although the fluid-tissue interaction between the basilar membrane and the fluid in scala tympani (ST) has been explored in both active and passive cochleae, there was no experimental data on the fluid-tissue interaction on the scala media (SM) side of the partition. To this aim, we measured sound-evoked intracochlear pressure in SM close to the partition using micropressure sensors. All the SM pressure data are from passive cochleae, likely because the SM cochleostomy led to loss of endocochlear potential. Thus, these experiments are studies of passive cochlear mechanics. SM pressure close to the tissue showed a pattern of peaks and notches, which could be explained as an interaction between fast and slow (i.e., traveling wave) pressure modes. In several animals SM and ST pressure were measured in the same cochlea. Similar to previous studies, ST-pressure was dominated by a slow, traveling wave mode at stimulus frequencies in the vicinity of the best frequency of the measurement location, and by a fast mode above best frequency. Antisymmetric pressure between SM and ST supported the classic single-partition cochlear models, or a dual-partition model with tight coupling between partitions. From the SM and ST pressure we calculated slow and fast modes, and from active ST pressure we extrapolated the passive findings to the active case. The passive slow mode estimated from SM and ST data was low-pass in nature, as predicted by cochlear models.
Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26682824      PMCID: PMC4699921          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  31 in total

1.  Response to a pure tone in a nonlinear mechanical-electrical-acoustical model of the cochlea.

Authors:  Julien Meaud; Karl Grosh
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Auditory nerve excitation via a non-traveling wave mode of basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  Stanley Huang; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-28

4.  Inertial bone conduction: symmetric and anti-symmetric components.

Authors:  Namkeun Kim; Kenji Homma; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-01

5.  Dual traveling waves in an inner ear model with two degrees of freedom.

Authors:  Jessica S Lamb; Richard S Chadwick
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Two-compartment passive frequency domain cochlea model allowing independent fluid coupling to the tectorial and basilar membranes.

Authors:  John Cormack; Yanju Liu; Jong-Hoon Nam; Sheryl M Gracewski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Hee Yoon Lee; Patrick D Raphael; Jesung Park; Audrey K Ellerbee; Brian E Applegate; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Basilar membrane responses to tones and tone complexes: nonlinear effects of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Corstiaen P C Versteegh; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-31

9.  Ossicular motion related to middle ear transmission delay in gerbil.

Authors:  Ombeline de La Rochefoucauld; Puja Kachroo; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Phase of shear vibrations within cochlear partition leads to activation of the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  Jessica S Lamb; Richard S Chadwick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  Two-Tone Suppression of Simultaneous Electrical and Mechanical Responses in the Cochlea.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Human cochlear hydrodynamics: A high-resolution μCT-based finite element study.

Authors:  Annalisa De Paolis; Hirobumi Watanabe; Jeremy T Nelson; Marom Bikson; Mark Packer; Luis Cardoso
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Forward and Reverse Waves: Modeling Distortion Products in the Intracochlear Fluid Pressure.

Authors:  Thomas Bowling; Julien Meaud
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Light sheet microscopy of the gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Kendall A Hutson; Stephen H Pulver; Pablo Ariel; Caroline Naso; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Hearing at threshold intensities: by slow mechanical traveling waves or by fast cochlear fluid pressure waves.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2020-08-06

7.  Two passive mechanical conditions modulate power generation by the outer hair cells.

Authors:  Yanju Liu; Sheryl M Gracewski; Jong-Hoon Nam
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.