Literature DB >> 27794292

Lexically guided perceptual tuning of internal phonetic category structure.

Julia R Drouin1, Rachel M Theodore1, Emily B Myers1.   

Abstract

Listeners use lexical information to retune the mapping between the acoustic signal and speech sound representations, resulting in changes to phonetic category boundaries. Other research shows that phonetic categories have a rich internal structure; within-category variation is represented in a graded fashion. The current work examined whether lexically informed perceptual learning promotes a comprehensive reorganization of internal category structure. The results showed a reorganization of internal structure for one but not both of the examined categories, which may reflect an attenuation of learning for distributions with extensive category overlap. This finding points towards potential input-driven constraints on lexically guided phonetic retuning.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27794292      PMCID: PMC6910001          DOI: 10.1121/1.4964468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production.

Authors:  R S Newman; S A Clouse; J L Burnham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: a distinction between lexical status and speaking rate.

Authors:  J S Allen; J L Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

3.  Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories.

Authors:  L E Volaitis; J L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Talker-specific influences on phonetic category structure.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Emily B Myers; Janice A Lomibao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual learning in speech.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Neural Systems Underlying Perceptual Adjustment to Non-Standard Speech Tokens.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Laura M Mesite
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Mechanisms of interaction in speech production.

Authors:  Melissa Baese-Berk; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2009-05-01

9.  Statistical learning of phonetic categories: insights from a computational approach.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Joseph C Toscano
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-04

10.  Perceptual learning of speech under optimal and adverse conditions.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

1.  Contextual Influences on Phonetic Categorization in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Jean A Campbell; Heather L McSherry; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Front Commun (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-09-19

2.  Lexically guided perceptual learning is robust to task-based changes in listening strategy.

Authors:  Julia R Drouin; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual learning of multiple talkers: Determinants, characteristics, and limitations.

Authors:  Shawn N Cummings; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.157

4.  Many tasks, same outcome: Role of training task on learning and maintenance of noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Julia R Drouin; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Talker-specific pronunciation or speech error? Discounting (or not) atypical pronunciations during speech perception.

Authors:  Linda Liu; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Cross-talker generalization in the perception of nonnative speech: A large-scale replication.

Authors:  Xin Xie; Linda Liu; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-08-09

7.  Listeners are initially flexible in updating phonetic beliefs over time.

Authors:  David Saltzman; Emily Myers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-19

8.  Individual Differences in Lexical Contributions to Speech Perception.

Authors:  Nikole Giovannone; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Listeners are maximally flexible in updating phonetic beliefs over time.

Authors:  David Saltzman; Emily Myers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.