Literature DB >> 11303932

The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production.

R S Newman1, S A Clouse, J L Burnham.   

Abstract

The effect of talker and token variability on speech perception has engendered a great deal of research. However, most of this research has compared listener performance in multiple-talker (or variable) situations to performance in single-talker conditions. It remains unclear to what extent listeners are affected by the degree of variability within a talker, rather than simply the existence of variability (being in a multitalker environment). The present study has two goals: First, the degree of variability among speakers in their /s/ and /S/ productions was measured. Even among a relatively small pool of talkers, there was a range of speech variability: some talkers had /s/ and /S/ categories that were quite distinct from one another in terms of frication centroid and skewness, while other speakers had categories that actually overlapped one another. The second goal was to examine whether this degree of variability within a talker influenced perception. Listeners were presented with natural /s/ and /S/ tokens for identification, under ideal listening conditions, and slower response times were found for speakers whose productions were more variable than for speakers with more internal consistency in their speech. This suggests that the degree of variability, not just the existence of it, may be the more critical factor in perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11303932     DOI: 10.1121/1.1348009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  49 in total

1.  Evaluating the spectral distinction between sibilant fricatives through a speaker-centered approach.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Elizabeth Seelinger; Kerry Callahan Mandulak; David J Zajac
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2010-10-01

2.  Production of contrast between sibilant fricatives by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; Jan R Edwards; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Phonetic enhancement of sibilants in infant-directed speech.

Authors:  Alejandrina Cristià
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Characteristics of listener sensitivity to talker-specific phonetic detail.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time: contextual influences.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Joanne L Miller; David DeSteno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Tyler P Ellis; Keith S Apfelbaum
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues.

Authors:  Meghan Clayards; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-06-25

8.  Positional effects in the lexical retuning of speech perception.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; James M McQueen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

9.  Quantifying the Robustness of the English Sibilant Fricative Contrast in Children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Holliday; Patrick F Reidy; Mary E Beckman; Jan Edwards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Sociolinguistic Perception as Inference Under Uncertainty.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; Kodi Weatherholtz; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.