Literature DB >> 36050170

Many tasks, same outcome: Role of training task on learning and maintenance of noise-vocoded speech.

Julia R Drouin1, Rachel M Theodore2.   

Abstract

Listeners who use cochlear implants show variability in speech recognition. Research suggests that structured auditory training can improve speech recognition outcomes in cochlear implant users, and a central goal in the rehabilitation literature is to identify factors that maximize training. Here, we examined factors that may influence perceptual learning for noise-vocoded speech in normal hearing listeners as a foundational step towards clinical recommendations. Three groups of listeners were exposed to anomalous noise-vocoded sentences and completed one of three training tasks: transcription with feedback, transcription without feedback, or talker identification. Listeners completed a word transcription test at three time points: immediately before training, immediately after training, and one week following training. Accuracy at test was indexed by keyword accuracy at the sentence-initial and sentence-final position for high and low predictability noise-vocoded sentences. Following training, listeners showed improved transcription for both sentence-initial and sentence-final items, and for both low and high predictability sentences. The training groups showed robust and equivalent learning of noise-vocoded sentences immediately after training. Critically, gains were largely maintained equivalently among training groups one week later. These results converge with evidence pointing towards the utility of non-traditional training tasks to maximize perceptual learning of noise-vocoded speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36050170      PMCID: PMC9553285          DOI: 10.1121/10.0013507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  42 in total

1.  Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair; Wolfgang Arnold; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Joachim Müller; Peter Roland
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Alexis Hervais-Adelman; Karen Taylor; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-05

3.  Deaf children with cochlear implants do not appear to use sentence context to help recognize spoken words.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; Joanne A Deocampo; Anne M Walk; Esperanza M Anaya; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The Nationwide Speech Project: A new corpus of American English dialects.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 5.  Verbal auditory closure and the speech perception in noise (SPIN) Test.

Authors:  L L Elliott
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1995-12

6.  Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson; L K Tyler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1980-03

8.  Changes in synthetic and natural vowel perception after specific training for congenitally deafened patients using a multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  P W Dawson; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder.

Authors:  Alexander L Anwyl-Irvine; Jessica Massonnié; Adam Flitton; Natasha Kirkham; Jo K Evershed
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

10.  Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention.

Authors:  Conor J Wild; Afiqah Yusuf; Daryl E Wilson; Jonathan E Peelle; Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.