Literature DB >> 11521848

Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: a distinction between lexical status and speaking rate.

J S Allen1, J L Miller.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that phonetic categories have a graded internal structure that is highly dependent on acoustic-phonetic contextual factors, such as speaking rate; these factors alter not only the location of phonetic category boundaries, but also the location of a category's best exemplars. The purpose of the present investigation, which focused on the voiceless category as specified by voice onset time (VOT), was to determine whether a higher order linguistic contextual factor, lexical status, which is known to alter the location of the voiced-voiceless phonetic category boundary, also alters the location of the best exemplars of the voiceless category. The results indicated that lexical status has a more limited and qualitatively different effect on the category's best exemplars than does the acoustic-phonetic factor of speaking rate. This dissociation is discussed in terms of a production-based account in which perceived best exemplars of a category track contextual variation in speech production.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11521848     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

1.  Characteristics of listener sensitivity to talker-specific phonetic detail.

Authors:  Rachel M Theodore; Joanne L Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A temporally dynamic context effect that disrupts voice onset time discrimination of rapidly successive stimuli.

Authors:  Jacqueline Liederman; Richard Frye; Janet McGraw Fisher; Kimberly Greenwood; Rebecca Alexander
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

3.  Sparseness of vowel category structure: Evidence from English dialect comparison.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Lingua       Date:  2014-02-01

4.  Lexically guided perceptual tuning of internal phonetic category structure.

Authors:  Julia R Drouin; Rachel M Theodore; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Dynamic EEG analysis during language comprehension reveals interactive cascades between perceptual processing and sentential expectations.

Authors:  McCall E Sarrett; Bob McMurray; Efthymia C Kapnoula
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus; Michael J Spivey; Dana Subik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Effects of language experience on the perception of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Jill P Morford; Angus B Grieve-Smith; James MacFarlane; Joshua Staley; Gabriel Waters
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-10-02

8.  An orthographic effect in phoneme processing, and its limitations.

Authors:  Anne Cutler; Chris Davis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.