Literature DB >> 6444985

Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

W F Ganong.   

Abstract

To investigate the interaction in speech perception of auditory information and lexical knowledge (in particular, knowledge of which phonetic sequences are words), acoustic continua varying in voice onset time were constructed so that for each acoustic continuum, one of the two possible phonetic categorizations made a word and the other did not. For example, one continuum ranged between the word dash and the nonword tash; another used the nonword dask and the word task. In two experiments, subjects showed a significant lexical effect--that is, a tendency to make phonetic categorizations that make words. This lexical effect was greater at the phoneme boundary (where auditory information is ambiguous) than at the ends of the condinua. Hence the lexical effect must arise at a stage of processing sensitive to both lexical knowledge and auditory information.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6444985     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.6.1.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  127 in total

1.  Differences in auditory processing of words and pseudowords: an fMRI study.

Authors:  S D Newman; D Twieg
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Bayes factor of model selection validates FLMP.

Authors:  D W Massaro; M M Cohen; C S Campbell; T Rodriguez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

3.  Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice.

Authors:  Lynne C Nygaard; Erin R Lunders
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

4.  Probabilistic constraint satisfaction at the lexical/phonetic interface: evidence for gradient effects of within-category VOT on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Michael J Spivey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-01

Review 5.  Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: a review and theoretical interpretation.

Authors:  S A Duffy; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1992 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners.

Authors:  R A Yamada; Y Tohkura
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

7.  Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg; Anne L R Duchen; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Simultaneous tracking of coevolving distributional regularities in speech.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.