Literature DB >> 33742423

Listeners are initially flexible in updating phonetic beliefs over time.

David Saltzman1, Emily Myers2.   

Abstract

Perceptual learning serves as a mechanism for listeners to adapt to novel phonetic information. Distributional tracking theories posit that this adaptation occurs as a result of listeners accumulating talker-specific distributional information about the phonetic category in question (Kleinschmidt & Jaeger, Psychological Review, 122, 148-203, 2015). What is not known is how listeners build these talker-specific distributions-that is, if they aggregate all information received over a certain time period, or if they rely more heavily upon the most recent information received and down-weight older, consolidated information. In the present experiment, listeners were exposed to four interleaved blocks of a lexical decision task and a phonetic categorization task in which the lexical decision blocks were designed to bias perception in opposite directions of a "s"-"sh" contrast. Listeners returned several days later and completed the identical task again. In each individual session, listener's perception of a "s"-"sh" contrast was biased by the information in the immediately preceding lexical decision block (though only when participants heard the "sh"-biasing block first, which was likely driven by stimulus characteristics). There was evidence that listeners accrued information about the talker over time since the bias effect diminished in the second session. In general, results suggest that listeners initially maintain some flexibility with their talker-specific phonetic representations, but over the course of several exposures begin to consolidate these representations.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Perceptual learning; Speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33742423      PMCID: PMC8667591          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01885-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  23 in total

1.  The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production.

Authors:  R S Newman; S A Clouse; J L Burnham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Consolidation during sleep of perceptual learning of spoken language.

Authors:  Kimberly M Fenn; Howard C Nusbaum; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Perceptual learning in speech: stability over time.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; James M McQueen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues.

Authors:  Meghan Clayards; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-06-25

5.  Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory.

Authors:  S D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Lexically guided perceptual tuning of internal phonetic category structure.

Authors:  Julia R Drouin; Rachel M Theodore; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal?

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Neural Systems Underlying Perceptual Adjustment to Non-Standard Speech Tokens.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Laura M Mesite
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Sleep and native language interference affect non-native speech sound learning.

Authors:  F Sayako Earle; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Statistical learning of phonetic categories: insights from a computational approach.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Joseph C Toscano
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Perceptual learning of multiple talkers requires additional exposure.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; Hannah Mechtenberg; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.157

2.  Listener expectations and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability: A pre-registered replication.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; David Saltzman; Emily B Myers; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.