Literature DB >> 30992124

Adaptation of Cochlear Amplification to Low Endocochlear Potential.

Yi Wang1, Elika Fallah1, Elizabeth S Olson2.   

Abstract

Endocochlear potential (EP) is essential for cochlear amplification by providing the voltage source needed to drive outer hair cell (OHC) transducer current, which leads to OHC electromechanical force. An early study using furosemide to reversibly reduce EP showed that distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) recovered before EP. This indicated that cochlear amplification may be able to adjust to a new, lower EP. To investigate the mechanism of this adjustment, the extracellular OHC voltage, which we term local cochlear microphonic (LCM), was measured simultaneously with DPOAE and EP while using intraperitoneal (IP) and intravenous injection of furosemide to reversibly reduce EP. With IP injection, the DPOAEs recovered fully, whereas the EP was reduced, but LCM showed a similar time course as EP. The DPOAEs failed to accurately report the variation of cochlear amplification. With intravenous injection, for which both reduction and recovery of EP are known to occur relatively quickly compared to IP, the cochlear amplification observed in LCM could attain nearly full or even full recovery with reduced EP. This showed the cochlea has an ability to adjust to diminished operating condition. Furthermore, the cochlear amplifier and EP recovered with different time courses: cochlear amplification just started to recover after the EP was nearly fully recovered and stabilized. Using a Boltzmann model and the second harmonic of the LCM to estimate the mechanoelectric transducer channel operating point, we found that the recovery of cochlear amplification occurred with recentering of the operating point.
Copyright © 2019 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30992124      PMCID: PMC6506630          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  66 in total

1.  Cl- flux through a non-selective, stretch-sensitive conductance influences the outer hair cell motor of the guinea-pig.

Authors:  Volodymyr Rybalchenko; Joseph Santos-Sacchi
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Basilar membrane mechanics in the 6-9 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae.

Authors:  William S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  How is the highly positive endocochlear potential formed? The specific architecture of the stria vascularis and the roles of the ion-transport apparatus.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hibino; Fumiaki Nin; Chizuru Tsuzuki; Yoshihisa Kurachi
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Spectral Ripples in Round-Window Cochlear Microphonics: Evidence for Multiple Generation Mechanisms.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-16

5.  Model for the nonlinear characteristics of cochlear potentials.

Authors:  A M Engebretson; D H Eldredge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation.

Authors:  D M Mills; S J Norton; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The modulation of the sensitivity of the mammalian cochlea by low frequency tones. III. Basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  R Patuzzi; P M Sellick; B M Johnstone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Organ of Corti potentials and the motion of the basilar membrane.

Authors:  Anders Fridberger; Jacques Boutet de Monvel; Jiefu Zheng; Ning Hu; Yuan Zou; Tianying Ren; Alfred Nuttall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 6.709

10.  Prestin-driven cochlear amplification is not limited by the outer hair cell membrane time constant.

Authors:  Stuart L Johnson; Maryline Beurg; Walter Marcotti; Robert Fettiplace
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  9 in total

1.  Manipulation of the Endocochlear Potential Reveals Two Distinct Types of Cochlear Nonlinearity.

Authors:  C Elliott Strimbu; Yi Wang; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Early Detection of Endolymphatic Hydrops using the Auditory Nerve Overlapped Waveform (ANOW).

Authors:  C Lee; C V Valenzuela; S S Goodman; D Kallogjeri; C A Buchman; J T Lichtenhan
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Modeling the effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel scores.

Authors:  Harshavardhan Settibhaktini; Michael G Heinz; Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Model of cochlear microphonic explores the tuning and magnitude of hair cell transduction current.

Authors:  Brian Frost; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.699

5.  Salicylate-induced changes in organ of Corti vibrations.

Authors:  C Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.672

Review 6.  Encoding sound in the cochlea: from receptor potential to afferent discharge.

Authors:  Mark A Rutherford; Henrique von Gersdorff; Juan D Goutman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Hearing consequences in Gjb2 knock-in mice: implications for human p.V37I mutation.

Authors:  Xin Lin; Gen Li; Yu Zhang; Jingjing Zhao; Jiawen Lu; Yunge Gao; Huihui Liu; Geng-Lin Li; Tao Yang; Lei Song; Hao Wu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 5.682

8.  A role for tectorial membrane mechanics in activating the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  Amir Nankali; Yi Wang; Clark Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson; Karl Grosh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Nonlinearity of intracochlear motion and local cochlear microphonic: Comparison between guinea pig and gerbil.

Authors:  Elika Fallah; C Elliott Strimbu; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.672

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.