Literature DB >> 8473244

Two-tone suppression and distortion production on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae.

W S Rhode1, N P Cooper.   

Abstract

Two-tone suppression and two-tone distortion were investigated at the level of the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae using a displacement-sensitive laser interferometric measurement system. The system allowed measurements to be performed at physiological stimulus levels in the cochlear region tuned to 30-35 kHz in cat and 29 kHz in guinea pig. The amplitude of vibration of the basilar membrane due to a probe tone at the characteristic frequency (CF) was attenuated during the presentation of a simultaneous suppressor tone either above or below CF. The amount of suppression depended on the intensities of both probe and suppressor, and the relationship of the suppressor frequency to the CF. Suppressors at frequencies more than an octave below the CF attenuated the responses to the CF probe at a rate of up to 1 dB/dB, with little variation based on suppressor frequency. As the suppressor frequency was increased above CF the rate of suppression decreased rapidly. The lowest suppressor intensity at which attenuation of the probe response was observed did not vary in direct proportion to the probe intensity. This suppression threshold often varied only a few dB SPL when the probe was varied over a 20 dB SPL range. In a few instances the rate of attenuation was as much as a factor of two greater at the lowest probe intensities than at higher intensities. It is noteworthy that suppression was found when the frequency of the suppressor was either above or below CF in the same preparation. Low frequency suppressor tones suppress basilar membrane motion at the CF when the basilar membrane undergoes displacement toward either scala. The maximum suppression occurs around 100 microseconds after the peak excursions caused by the low frequency biasing tone. Two-tone distortion products were often observed even at stimulus levels below those causing two-tone suppression at the site studied. The cubic difference tone (CDT) was the most prominent of the distortion products. The level of the CDT component varied nonmonotonically with the level of either of the primary tones. Responses at the difference frequency between the two primaries were usually below the noise floor of the recording system. The existence of both two-tone distortion and two-tone suppression was dependent on the presence of a cochlear nonlinearity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8473244     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90257-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  30 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing.

Authors:  F Jülicher; D Andor; T Duke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Distortion in those good vibrations.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Direction of wave propagation in the cochlea for internally excited basilar membrane.

Authors:  Yizeng Li; Karl Grosh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Two-tone distortion at different longitudinal locations on the basilar membrane.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Alfred L Nuttall; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Kelly L Watts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal aspects of suppression in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodriguez; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Low-frequency suppression of auditory nerve responses to characteristic frequency tones.

Authors:  A N Temchin; N C Rich; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.