Literature DB >> 27718028

Measuring experimental cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge.

Ariën S Rustenburg1,2, Justin Dancer3,4, Baiwei Lin3, Jianwen A Feng5, Daniel F Ortwine3, David L Mobley6, John D Chodera7.   

Abstract

Small molecule distribution coefficients between immiscible nonaqueuous and aqueous phases-such as cyclohexane and water-measure the degree to which small molecules prefer one phase over another at a given pH. As distribution coefficients capture both thermodynamic effects (the free energy of transfer between phases) and chemical effects (protonation state and tautomer effects in aqueous solution), they provide an exacting test of the thermodynamic and chemical accuracy of physical models without the long correlation times inherent to the prediction of more complex properties of relevance to drug discovery, such as protein-ligand binding affinities. For the SAMPL5 challenge, we carried out a blind prediction exercise in which participants were tasked with the prediction of distribution coefficients to assess its potential as a new route for the evaluation and systematic improvement of predictive physical models. These measurements are typically performed for octanol-water, but we opted to utilize cyclohexane for the nonpolar phase. Cyclohexane was suggested to avoid issues with the high water content and persistent heterogeneous structure of water-saturated octanol phases, since it has greatly reduced water content and a homogeneous liquid structure. Using a modified shake-flask LC-MS/MS protocol, we collected cyclohexane/water distribution coefficients for a set of 53 druglike compounds at pH 7.4. These measurements were used as the basis for the SAMPL5 Distribution Coefficient Challenge, where 18 research groups predicted these measurements before the experimental values reported here were released. In this work, we describe the experimental protocol we utilized for measurement of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients, report the measured data, propose a new bootstrap-based data analysis procedure to incorporate multiple sources of experimental error, and provide insights to help guide future iterations of this valuable exercise in predictive modeling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blind challenge; Distribution coefficients; Partition coefficients; Predictive modeling; SAMPL

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27718028      PMCID: PMC5209288          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9971-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  19 in total

1.  Direct calculation of 1-octanol-water partition coefficients from adaptive biasing force molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Navendu Bhatnagar; Ganesh Kamath; Issac Chelst; Jeffrey J Potoff
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Protonation changes upon ligand binding to trypsin and thrombin: structural interpretation based on pK(a) calculations and ITC experiments.

Authors:  Paul Czodrowski; Christoph A Sotriffer; Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Calculation of molecular lipophilicity: State-of-the-art and comparison of log P methods on more than 96,000 compounds.

Authors:  Raimund Mannhold; Gennadiy I Poda; Claude Ostermann; Igor V Tetko
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients with COSMO-RS on the SAMPL5 data set.

Authors:  Andreas Klamt; Frank Eckert; Jens Reinisch; Karin Wichmann
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 7.  Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Karisa L Wymer; Nathan M Lim; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Microscopic structure and solvation in dry and wet octanol.

Authors:  Bin Chen; J Ilja Siepmann
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 9.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Tracing changes in protonation: a prerequisite to factorize thermodynamic data of inhibitor binding to aldose reductase.

Authors:  Holger Steuber; Paul Czodrowski; Christoph A Sotriffer; Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  28 in total

1.  pKa measurements for the SAMPL6 prediction challenge for a set of kinase inhibitor-like fragments.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Dorothy Levorse; Ariën S Rustenburg; Ikenna E Ndukwe; Heather Wang; Xiao Wang; Mikhail Reibarkh; Gary E Martin; Alexey A Makarov; David L Mobley; Timothy Rhodes; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  The influence of hydrogen bonding on partition coefficients.

Authors:  Nádia Melo Borges; Peter W Kenny; Carlos A Montanari; Igor M Prokopczyk; Jean F R Ribeiro; Josmar R Rocha; Geraldo Rodrigues Sartori
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Octanol-water partition coefficient measurements for the SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Dorothy Levorse; David L Mobley; Timothy Rhodes; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients with COSMO-RS on the SAMPL5 data set.

Authors:  Andreas Klamt; Frank Eckert; Jens Reinisch; Karin Wichmann
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Predicting cyclohexane/water distribution coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge using MOSCED and the SMD solvation model.

Authors:  Sebastian Diaz-Rodriguez; Samantha M Bozada; Jeremy R Phifer; Andrew S Paluch
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Calculating distribution coefficients based on multi-scale free energy simulations: an evaluation of MM and QM/MM explicit solvent simulations of water-cyclohexane transfer in the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Frank C Pickard; Jing Huang; Andrew C Simmonett; Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Pavlo O Dral; Samarjeet Prasad; Michael Jones; Yihan Shao; Walter Thiel; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients for the SAMPL5 data set using molecular dynamics simulations with the OPLS-AA force field.

Authors:  Ian M Kenney; Oliver Beckstein; Bogdan I Iorga
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficient for SAMPL5 drug-like compounds with the QMPFF3 and ARROW polarizable force fields.

Authors:  Ganesh Kamath; Igor Kurnikov; Boris Fain; Igor Leontyev; Alexey Illarionov; Oleg Butin; Michael Olevanov; Leonid Pereyaslavets
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  An explicit-solvent hybrid QM and MM approach for predicting pKa of small molecules in SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Samarjeet Prasad; Jing Huang; Qiao Zeng; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  An efficient protocol for obtaining accurate hydration free energies using quantum chemistry and reweighting from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.