Literature DB >> 17905306

Tracing changes in protonation: a prerequisite to factorize thermodynamic data of inhibitor binding to aldose reductase.

Holger Steuber1, Paul Czodrowski, Christoph A Sotriffer, Gerhard Klebe.   

Abstract

To prevent diabetic complications derived from enhanced glucose flux via the polyol pathway the development of aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs) has been established as a promising therapeutic concept. Here, we study the binding process of inhibitors to aldose reductase (ALR2) with respect to changes of the protonation inventory upon complex formation. Knowledge of such processes is a prerequisite to factorize the binding free energy into enthalpic and entropic contributions on an absolute scale. Our isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) measurements suggest a proton uptake upon complex formation with carboxylate-type inhibitors. As the protonation event will contribute strongly to the enthalpic signal recorded during ITC experiments, knowledge about the proton-accepting and releasing functional groups of the system is of utmost importance. However, this is intricate to retrieve, if, as in the present case, both, binding site and ligand possess several titratable groups. Here, we present pKa calculations complemented by mutagenesis and thermodynamic measurements suggesting a tyrosine residue located in the catalytic site (Tyr48) as a likely candidate to act as proton acceptor upon inhibitor binding, as it occurs deprotonated to a remarkable extent if only the cofactor NADP+ is bound. We furthermore provide evidence that the protonation state and binding thermodynamics depend strongly on the oxidation state of the cofactor;s nicotinamide moiety. Binding thermodynamics of IDD 388, IDD 393, tolrestat, sorbinil, and fidarestat are discussed in the context of substituent effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17905306     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.08.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  12 in total

1.  Structural basis for 18-β-glycyrrhetinic acid as a novel non-GSH analog glyoxalase I inhibitor.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Qiang Huang; Jing Zhai; Yi-ning Zhao; Li-ping Zhang; Yun-yun Chen; Ren-wei Zhang; Qing Li; Xiao-peng Hu
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  Applying thermodynamic profiling in lead finding and optimization.

Authors:  Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Protonation and pK changes in protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Alexey V Onufriev; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.318

5.  Measuring experimental cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Ariën S Rustenburg; Justin Dancer; Baiwei Lin; Jianwen A Feng; Daniel F Ortwine; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Targeting the blind spot of polycationic nanocarrier-based siRNA delivery.

Authors:  Mengyao Zheng; Giovanni M Pavan; Manuel Neeb; Andreas K Schaper; Andrea Danani; Gerhard Klebe; Olivia M Merkel; Thomas Kissel
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 7.  Binding of small-molecule ligands to proteins: "what you see" is not always "what you get".

Authors:  David L Mobley; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Exploiting activity cliffs for building pharmacophore models and comparison with other pharmacophore generation methods: sphingosine kinase 1 as case study.

Authors:  Lubabah A Mousa; Ma'mon M Hatmal; Mutasem Taha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Binding Pose Flip Explained via Enthalpic and Entropic Contributions.

Authors:  Michael Schauperl; Paul Czodrowski; Julian E Fuchs; Roland G Huber; Birgit J Waldner; Maren Podewitz; Christian Kramer; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Bayesian analysis of isothermal titration calorimetry for binding thermodynamics.

Authors:  Trung Hai Nguyen; Ariën S Rustenburg; Stefan G Krimmer; Hexi Zhang; John D Clark; Paul A Novick; Kim Branson; Vijay S Pande; John D Chodera; David D L Minh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.