Literature DB >> 30406372

pKa measurements for the SAMPL6 prediction challenge for a set of kinase inhibitor-like fragments.

Mehtap Işık1,2, Dorothy Levorse3, Ariën S Rustenburg1,4, Ikenna E Ndukwe5, Heather Wang6, Xiao Wang5, Mikhail Reibarkh5, Gary E Martin5, Alexey A Makarov6, David L Mobley7, Timothy Rhodes8, John D Chodera9.   

Abstract

Determining the net charge and protonation states populated by a small molecule in an environment of interest or the cost of altering those protonation states upon transfer to another environment is a prerequisite for predicting its physicochemical and pharmaceutical properties. The environment of interest can be aqueous, an organic solvent, a protein binding site, or a lipid bilayer. Predicting the protonation state of a small molecule is essential to predicting its interactions with biological macromolecules using computational models. Incorrectly modeling the dominant protonation state, shifts in dominant protonation state, or the population of significant mixtures of protonation states can lead to large modeling errors that degrade the accuracy of physical modeling. Low accuracy hinders the use of physical modeling approaches for molecular design. For small molecules, the acid dissociation constant (pKa) is the primary quantity needed to determine the ionic states populated by a molecule in an aqueous solution at a given pH. As a part of SAMPL6 community challenge, we organized a blind pKa prediction component to assess the accuracy with which contemporary pKa prediction methods can predict this quantity, with the ultimate aim of assessing the expected impact on modeling errors this would induce. While a multitude of approaches for predicting pKa values currently exist, predicting the pKas of drug-like molecules can be difficult due to challenging properties such as multiple titratable sites, heterocycles, and tautomerization. For this challenge, we focused on set of 24 small molecules selected to resemble selective kinase inhibitors-an important class of therapeutics replete with titratable moieties. Using a Sirius T3 instrument that performs automated acid-base titrations, we used UV absorbance-based pKa measurements to construct a high-quality experimental reference dataset of macroscopic pKas for the evaluation of computational pKa prediction methodologies that was utilized in the SAMPL6 pKa challenge. For several compounds in which the microscopic protonation states associated with macroscopic pKas were ambiguous, we performed follow-up NMR experiments to disambiguate the microstates involved in the transition. This dataset provides a useful standard benchmark dataset for the evaluation of pKa prediction methodologies on kinase inhibitor-like compounds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid dissociation constants; Blind prediction challenge; Macroscopic pK a; Macroscopic protonation state; Microscopic pK a; Microscopic protonation state; SAMPL; Spectrophotometric pK a measurement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30406372      PMCID: PMC6367941          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0168-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  33 in total

1.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Multiwavelength spectrophotometric determination of acid dissociation constants of ionizable drugs.

Authors:  R I Allen; K J Box; J E Comer; C Peake; K Y Tam
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.935

4.  New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays.

Authors:  Jonathan B Baell; Georgina A Holloway
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  KNIME Workflow to Assess PAINS Filters in SMARTS Format. Comparison of RDKit and Indigo Cheminformatics Libraries.

Authors:  Simon Saubern; Rajarshi Guha; Jonathan B Baell
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.353

Review 6.  Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Karisa L Wymer; Nathan M Lim; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Triprotic acid-base microequilibria and pharmacokinetic sequelae of cetirizine.

Authors:  Attila Marosi; Zsuzsanna Kovács; Szabolcs Béni; József Kökösi; Béla Noszál
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 8.  Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael W Chiu; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.

Authors:  David S Wishart; Craig Knox; An Chi Guo; Savita Shrivastava; Murtaza Hassanali; Paul Stothard; Zhan Chang; Jennifer Woolsey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  21 in total

1.  Octanol-water partition coefficient measurements for the SAMPL6 blind prediction challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Dorothy Levorse; David L Mobley; Timothy Rhodes; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Thomas Fox; Andrea Rizzi; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  COSMO-RS based predictions for the SAMPL6 logP challenge.

Authors:  Christoph Loschen; Jens Reinisch; Andreas Klamt
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Prediction of the n-octanol/water partition coefficients in the SAMPL6 blind challenge from MST continuum solvation calculations.

Authors:  William J Zamora; Silvana Pinheiro; Kilian German; Clara Ràfols; Carles Curutchet; F Javier Luque
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Standard state free energies, not pKas, are ideal for describing small molecule protonation and tautomeric states.

Authors:  M R Gunner; Taichi Murakami; Ariën S Rustenburg; Mehtap Işık; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  SAMPL6 challenge results from [Formula: see text] predictions based on a general Gaussian process model.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; David L Mobley; A Geoffrey Skillman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  An explicit-solvent hybrid QM and MM approach for predicting pKa of small molecules in SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Samarjeet Prasad; Jing Huang; Qiao Zeng; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients for the SAMPL6-[Formula: see text] molecules using molecular dynamics simulations with OPLS-AA, AMBER and CHARMM force fields.

Authors:  Shujie Fan; Bogdan I Iorga; Oliver Beckstein
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Quantum chemical predictions of water-octanol partition coefficients applied to the SAMPL6 logP blind challenge.

Authors:  Michael R Jones; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  SAMPL7: Host-guest binding prediction by molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics.

Authors:  Yiğitcan Eken; Nuno M S Almeida; Cong Wang; Angela K Wilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.