Literature DB >> 24615156

Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

David L Mobley1, Karisa L Wymer, Nathan M Lim, J Peter Guthrie.   

Abstract

Here, we give an overview of the small molecule hydration portion of the SAMPL4 challenge, which focused on predicting hydration free energies for a series of 47 small molecules. These gas-to-water transfer free energies have in the past proven a valuable test of a variety of computational methods and force fields. Here, in contrast to some previous SAMPL challenges, we find a relatively wide range of methods perform quite well on this test set, with RMS errors in the 1.2 kcal/mol range for several of the best performing methods. Top-performers included a quantum mechanical approach with continuum solvent models and functional group corrections, alchemical molecular dynamics simulations with a classical all-atom force field, and a single-conformation Poisson-Boltzmann approach. While 1.2 kcal/mol is still a significant error, experimental hydration free energies covered a range of nearly 20 kcal/mol, so methods typically showed substantial predictive power. Here, a substantial new focus was on evaluation of error estimates, as predicting when a computational prediction is reliable versus unreliable has considerable practical value. We found, however, that in many cases errors are substantially underestimated, and that typically little effort has been invested in estimating likely error. We believe this is an important area for further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24615156      PMCID: PMC4006301          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9718-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  26 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  SAMPL2 and continuum modeling.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls; Stanislaw Wlodek; J Andrew Grant
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Predicting hydration free energies using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations and multiple starting conformations.

Authors:  Pavel V Klimovich; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Comparison of charge models for fixed-charge force fields: small-molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Elise Dumont; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Conformer generation with OMEGA: learning from the data set and the analysis of failures.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  SAMPL4, a blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: the compounds considered.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Predictions of hydration free energies from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Christopher I Bayly; Matthew D Cooper; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  A fixed-charge model for alcohol polarization in the condensed phase, and its role in small molecule hydration.

Authors:  Christopher J Fennell; Karisa L Wymer; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  77 in total

1.  Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; Gaetano Calabró; Daisy Y Kyu; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Adapting the semi-explicit assembly solvation model for estimating water-cyclohexane partitioning with the SAMPL5 molecules.

Authors:  Emiliano Brini; S Shanaka Paranahewage; Christopher J Fennell; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  pKa measurements for the SAMPL6 prediction challenge for a set of kinase inhibitor-like fragments.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Dorothy Levorse; Ariën S Rustenburg; Ikenna E Ndukwe; Heather Wang; Xiao Wang; Mikhail Reibarkh; Gary E Martin; Alexey A Makarov; David L Mobley; Timothy Rhodes; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Performance of the SMD and SM8 models for predicting solvation free energy of neutral solutes in methanol, dimethyl sulfoxide and acetonitrile.

Authors:  Caroline C Zanith; Josefredo R Pliego
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  High accuracy quantum-chemistry-based calculation and blind prediction of macroscopic pKa values in the context of the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Philipp Pracht; Rainer Wilcken; Anikó Udvarhelyi; Stephane Rodde; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  "Solvent hydrogen-bond occlusion": A new model of polar desolvation for biomolecular energetics.

Authors:  Andrea Bazzoli; John Karanicolas
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  An efficient protocol for obtaining accurate hydration free energies using quantum chemistry and reweighting from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Computation of Hydration Free Energies Using the Multiple Environment Single System Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Method.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Ye Mei; Frank C Pickard; Andrew C Simmonett; Benjamin T Miller; John M Herbert; H Lee Woodcock; Bernard R Brooks; Yihan Shao
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Examining the assumptions underlying continuum-solvent models.

Authors:  Robert C Harris; B Montgomery Pettitt
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.