Literature DB >> 27585472

Prediction of cyclohexane-water distribution coefficient for SAMPL5 drug-like compounds with the QMPFF3 and ARROW polarizable force fields.

Ganesh Kamath1, Igor Kurnikov1, Boris Fain1, Igor Leontyev1, Alexey Illarionov1, Oleg Butin1, Michael Olevanov1, Leonid Pereyaslavets2.   

Abstract

We present the performance of blind predictions of water-cyclohexane distribution coefficients for 53 drug-like compounds in the SAMPL5 challenge by three methods currently in use within our group. Two of them utilize QMPFF3 and ARROW, polarizable force-fields of varying complexity, and the third uses the General Amber Force-Field (GAFF). The polarizable FF's are implemented in an in-house MD package, Arbalest. We find that when we had time to parametrize the functional groups with care (batch 0), the polarizable force-fields outperformed the non-polarizable one. Conversely, on the full set of 53 compounds, GAFF performed better than both QMPFF3 and ARROW. We also describe the torsion-restrain method we used to improve sampling of molecular conformational space and thus the overall accuracy of prediction. The SAMPL5 challenge highlighted several drawbacks of our force-fields, such as our significant systematic over-estimation of hydrophobic interactions, specifically for alkanes and aromatic rings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARROW; Free energies; GAFF; Polarizable force fields; QMPFF3; SAMPL5

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27585472     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9958-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  36 in total

1.  Calculation of the water-cyclohexane transfer free energies of neutral amino acid side-chain analogs using the OPLS all-atom force field.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; D Peter Tieleman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-11-30       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Dispersion energy from density-functional theory description of monomers.

Authors:  Alston J Misquitta; Bogumil Jeziorski; Krzysztof Szalewicz
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model.

Authors:  Sandeep Patel; Alexander D Mackerell; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Polarizable Force Fields:  History, Test Cases, and Prospects.

Authors:  Arieh Warshel; Mitsunori Kato; Andrei V Pisliakov
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Charge Transfer from Regularized Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory.

Authors:  Alston J Misquitta
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 7.  Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Karisa L Wymer; Nathan M Lim; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Measuring experimental cyclohexane-water distribution coefficients for the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Ariën S Rustenburg; Justin Dancer; Baiwei Lin; Jianwen A Feng; Daniel F Ortwine; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: I parameterization and application to bulk organic liquid simulations.

Authors:  Sandeep Patel; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  The Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Zhen Xia; Jiajing Zhang; Robert Best; Chuanjie Wu; Jay W Ponder; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  5 in total

1.  Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Thomas Fox; Andrea Rizzi; John D Chodera; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Predicting partition coefficients of drug-like molecules in the SAMPL6 challenge with Drude polarizable force fields.

Authors:  Ye Ding; You Xu; Cheng Qian; Jinfeng Chen; Jian Zhu; Houhou Huang; Yi Shi; Jing Huang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  On the importance of accounting for nuclear quantum effects in ab initio calibrated force fields in biological simulations.

Authors:  Leonid Pereyaslavets; Igor Kurnikov; Ganesh Kamath; Oleg Butin; Alexey Illarionov; Igor Leontyev; Michael Olevanov; Michael Levitt; Roger D Kornberg; Boris Fain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Benchmark assessment of molecular geometries and energies from small molecule force fields.

Authors:  Victoria T Lim; David F Hahn; Gary Tresadern; Christopher I Bayly; David L Mobley
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-12-03

5.  Evaluation of log P, pKa, and log D predictions from the SAMPL7 blind challenge.

Authors:  Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Nicolas Tielker; Yingying Zhang; Junjun Mao; M R Gunner; Karol Francisco; Carlo Ballatore; Stefan M Kast; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.