| Literature DB >> 27585472 |
Ganesh Kamath1, Igor Kurnikov1, Boris Fain1, Igor Leontyev1, Alexey Illarionov1, Oleg Butin1, Michael Olevanov1, Leonid Pereyaslavets2.
Abstract
We present the performance of blind predictions of water-cyclohexane distribution coefficients for 53 drug-like compounds in the SAMPL5 challenge by three methods currently in use within our group. Two of them utilize QMPFF3 and ARROW, polarizable force-fields of varying complexity, and the third uses the General Amber Force-Field (GAFF). The polarizable FF's are implemented in an in-house MD package, Arbalest. We find that when we had time to parametrize the functional groups with care (batch 0), the polarizable force-fields outperformed the non-polarizable one. Conversely, on the full set of 53 compounds, GAFF performed better than both QMPFF3 and ARROW. We also describe the torsion-restrain method we used to improve sampling of molecular conformational space and thus the overall accuracy of prediction. The SAMPL5 challenge highlighted several drawbacks of our force-fields, such as our significant systematic over-estimation of hydrophobic interactions, specifically for alkanes and aromatic rings.Entities:
Keywords: ARROW; Free energies; GAFF; Polarizable force fields; QMPFF3; SAMPL5
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27585472 DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9958-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Comput Aided Mol Des ISSN: 0920-654X Impact factor: 3.686