Literature DB >> 24599514

The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Hari S Muddana1, Andrew T Fenley, David L Mobley, Michael K Gilson.   

Abstract

Prospective validation of methods for computing binding affinities can help assess their predictive power and thus set reasonable expectations for their performance in drug design applications. Supramolecular host-guest systems are excellent model systems for testing such affinity prediction methods, because their small size and limited conformational flexibility, relative to proteins, allows higher throughput and better numerical convergence. The SAMPL4 prediction challenge therefore included a series of host-guest systems, based on two hosts, cucurbit[7]uril and octa-acid. Binding affinities in aqueous solution were measured experimentally for a total of 23 guest molecules. Participants submitted 35 sets of computational predictions for these host-guest systems, based on methods ranging from simple docking, to extensive free energy simulations, to quantum mechanical calculations. Over half of the predictions provided better correlations with experiment than two simple null models, but most methods underperformed the null models in terms of root mean squared error and linear regression slope. Interestingly, the overall performance across all SAMPL4 submissions was similar to that for the prior SAMPL3 host-guest challenge, although the experimentalists took steps to simplify the current challenge. While some methods performed fairly consistently across both hosts, no single approach emerged as consistent top performer, and the nonsystematic nature of the various submissions made it impossible to draw definitive conclusions regarding the best choices of energy models or sampling algorithms. Salt effects emerged as an issue in the calculation of absolute binding affinities of cucurbit[7]uril-guest systems, but were not expected to affect the relative affinities significantly. Useful directions for future rounds of the challenge might involve encouraging participants to carry out some calculations that replicate each others' studies, and to systematically explore parameter options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24599514      PMCID: PMC4053502          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9735-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  55 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Chia-En Chang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Release of high-energy water as an essential driving force for the high-affinity binding of cucurbit[n]urils.

Authors:  Frank Biedermann; Vanya D Uzunova; Oren A Scherman; Werner M Nau; Alfonso De Simone
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Grid inhomogeneous solvation theory: hydration structure and thermodynamics of the miniature receptor cucurbit[7]uril.

Authors:  Crystal N Nguyen; Tom Kurtzman Young; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 9.  Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Karisa L Wymer; Nathan M Lim; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  The electrostatic response of water to neutral polar solutes: implications for continuum solvent modeling.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Neil V Sapra; Andrew T Fenley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  87 in total

1.  BEDAM binding free energy predictions for the SAMPL4 octa-acid host challenge.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Haoyuan Chen; He Chen; Michael Fitzgerald; Yang Gao; Peng He; Malathi Kalyanikar; Chuan Kao; Beidi Lu; Yijie Niu; Manasi Pethe; Jie Zhu; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  pKa measurements for the SAMPL6 prediction challenge for a set of kinase inhibitor-like fragments.

Authors:  Mehtap Işık; Dorothy Levorse; Ariën S Rustenburg; Ikenna E Ndukwe; Heather Wang; Xiao Wang; Mikhail Reibarkh; Gary E Martin; Alexey A Makarov; David L Mobley; Timothy Rhodes; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  An explicit-solvent hybrid QM and MM approach for predicting pKa of small molecules in SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Samarjeet Prasad; Jing Huang; Qiao Zeng; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Absolute binding free energies for octa-acids and guests in SAMPL5 : Evaluating binding free energies for octa-acid and guest complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Frank C Pickard Iv; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Escaping Atom Types in Force Fields Using Direct Chemical Perception.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Caitlin C Bannan; Andrea Rizzi; Christopher I Bayly; John D Chodera; Victoria T Lim; Nathan M Lim; Kyle A Beauchamp; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; Peter K Eastman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Lin Frank Song; Nupur Bansal; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Binding enthalpy calculations for a neutral host-guest pair yield widely divergent salt effects across water models.

Authors:  Kaifu Gao; Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; Andrew T Fenley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Examining the assumptions underlying continuum-solvent models.

Authors:  Robert C Harris; B Montgomery Pettitt
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.