| Literature DB >> 27577746 |
Gerhard König1,2, Frank C Pickard3, Jing Huang3, Andrew C Simmonett3, Florentina Tofoleanu3, Juyong Lee3, Pavlo O Dral4, Samarjeet Prasad3, Michael Jones3, Yihan Shao3, Walter Thiel4, Bernard R Brooks3.
Abstract
One of the central aspects of biomolecular recognition is the hydrophobic effect, which is experimentally evaluated by measuring the distribution coefficients of compounds between polar and apolar phases. We use our predictions of the distribution coefficients between water and cyclohexane from the SAMPL5 challenge to estimate the hydrophobicity of different explicit solvent simulation techniques. Based on molecular dynamics trajectories with the CHARMM General Force Field, we compare pure molecular mechanics (MM) with quantum-mechanical (QM) calculations based on QM/MM schemes that treat the solvent at the MM level. We perform QM/MM with both density functional theory (BLYP) and semi-empirical methods (OM1, OM2, OM3, PM3). The calculations also serve to test the sensitivity of partition coefficients to solute polarizability as well as the interplay of the quantum-mechanical region with the fixed-charge molecular mechanics environment. Our results indicate that QM/MM with both BLYP and OM2 outperforms pure MM. However, this observation is limited to a subset of cases where convergence of the free energy can be achieved.Entities:
Keywords: Cyclohexane; Distribution coefficient; Explicit solvent; Multi-scale free energy simulations; Partition coefficient; Water
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27577746 DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9936-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Comput Aided Mol Des ISSN: 0920-654X Impact factor: 3.686