Literature DB >> 27705958

Chronic in vivo stability assessment of carbon fiber microelectrode arrays.

Paras R Patel1, Huanan Zhang, Matthew T Robbins, Justin B Nofar, Shaun P Marshall, Michael J Kobylarek, Takashi D Y Kozai, Nicholas A Kotov, Cynthia A Chestek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Individual carbon fiber microelectrodes can record unit activity in both acute and semi-chronic (∼1 month) implants. Additionally, new methods have been developed to insert a 16 channel array of carbon fiber microelectrodes. Before assessing the in vivo long-term viability of these arrays, accelerated soak tests were carried out to determine the most stable site coating material. Next, a multi-animal, multi-month, chronic implantation study was carried out with carbon fiber microelectrode arrays and silicon electrodes. APPROACH: Carbon fibers were first functionalized with one of two different formulations of PEDOT and subjected to accelerated aging in a heated water bath. After determining the best PEDOT formula to use, carbon fiber arrays were chronically implanted in rat motor cortex. Some rodents were also implanted with a single silicon electrode, while others received both. At the end of the study a subset of animals were perfused and the brain tissue sliced. Tissue sections were stained for astrocytes, microglia, and neurons. The local reactive responses were assessed using qualitative and quantitative methods. MAIN
RESULTS: Electrophysiology recordings showed the carbon fibers detecting unit activity for at least 3 months with average amplitudes of ∼200 μV. Histology analysis showed the carbon fiber arrays with a minimal to non-existent glial scarring response with no adverse effects on neuronal density. Silicon electrodes showed large glial scarring that impacted neuronal counts. SIGNIFICANCE: This study has validated the use of carbon fiber microelectrode arrays as a chronic neural recording technology. These electrodes have demonstrated the ability to detect single units with high amplitude over 3 months, and show the potential to record for even longer periods. In addition, the minimal reactive response should hold stable indefinitely, as any response by the immune system may reach a steady state after 12 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27705958      PMCID: PMC5118062          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/6/066002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  65 in total

1.  Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Rio J Vetter; Justin C Williams; Jamille F Hetke; Elizabeth A Nunamaker; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Reduction of neurovascular damage resulting from microelectrode insertion into the cerebral cortex using in vivo two-photon mapping.

Authors:  T D Y Kozai; T C Marzullo; F Hooi; N B Langhals; A K Majewska; E B Brown; D R Kipke
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull.

Authors:  Roy Biran; Dave C Martin; Patrick A Tresco
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Effects of insertion conditions on tissue strain and vascular damage during neuroprosthetic device insertion.

Authors:  C S Bjornsson; S J Oh; Y A Al-Kofahi; Y J Lim; K L Smith; J N Turner; S De; B Roysam; W Shain; S J Kim
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  An alginate hydrogel dura mater replacement for use with intracortical electrodes.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Nunamaker; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  Short and long term biocompatibility of NeuroProbes silicon probes.

Authors:  László Grand; Lucia Wittner; Stanislav Herwik; Emmanuelle Göthelid; Patrick Ruther; Sven Oscarsson; Hercules Neves; Balázs Dombovári; Richárd Csercsa; György Karmos; István Ulbert
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Cerebral astrocyte response to micromachined silicon implants.

Authors:  J N Turner; W Shain; D H Szarowski; M Andersen; S Martins; M Isaacson; H Craighead
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Substrate dependent stability of conducting polymer coatings on medical electrodes.

Authors:  Rylie A Green; Rachelle T Hassarati; Lucie Bouchinet; Chaekyung S Lee; Gin L M Cheong; Jin F Yu; Christopher W Dodds; Gregg J Suaning; Laura A Poole-Warren; Nigel H Lovell
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Distinct representations and theta dynamics in dorsal and ventral hippocampus.

Authors:  Sébastien Royer; Anton Sirota; Jagdish Patel; György Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A comparison of chronic multi-channel cortical implantation techniques: manual versus mechanical insertion.

Authors:  R L Rennaker; S Street; A M Ruyle; A M Sloan
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  59 in total

1.  A low-power band of neuronal spiking activity dominated by local single units improves the performance of brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Samuel R Nason; Alex K Vaskov; Matthew S Willsey; Elissa J Welle; Hyochan An; Philip P Vu; Autumn J Bullard; Chrono S Nu; Jonathan C Kao; Krishna V Shenoy; Taekwang Jang; Hun-Seok Kim; David Blaauw; Parag G Patil; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Toward guiding principles for the design of biologically-integrated electrodes for the central nervous system.

Authors:  Cort H Thompson; Ti'Air E Riggins; Paras R Patel; Cynthia A Chestek; Wen Li; Erin Purcell
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Amorphous silicon carbide ultramicroelectrode arrays for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  Felix Deku; Yarden Cohen; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Aswini Kanneganti; Timothy J Gardner; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  Physiological properties of brain-machine interface input signals.

Authors:  Marc W Slutzky; Robert D Flint
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A Materials Roadmap to Functional Neural Interface Design.

Authors:  Steven M Wellman; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; John P Seymour; Nicholas J Michelson; William E McFadden; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 18.808

6.  The State of the NIH BRAIN Initiative.

Authors:  Walter Koroshetz; Joshua Gordon; Amy Adams; Andrea Beckel-Mitchener; James Churchill; Gregory Farber; Michelle Freund; Jim Gnadt; Nina S Hsu; Nicholas Langhals; Sarah Lisanby; Guoying Liu; Grace C Y Peng; Khara Ramos; Michael Steinmetz; Edmund Talley; Samantha White
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Quantitative simulation of extracellular single unit recording from the surface of cortex.

Authors:  Mackenna Hill; Estefania Rios; Shyam Kumar Sudhakar; Douglas H Roossien; Ciara Caldwell; Dawen Cai; Omar J Ahmed; Scott F Lempka; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Ultrasoft microwire neural electrodes improve chronic tissue integration.

Authors:  Zhanhong Jeff Du; Christi L Kolarcik; Takashi D Y Kozai; Silvia D Luebben; Shawn A Sapp; Xin Sally Zheng; James A Nabity; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Ultrasensitive Graphene Optoelectronic Probes for Recording Electrical Activities of Individual Synapses.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Mingjian Shi; Bryson Brewer; Lijie Yang; Yuchen Zhang; Donna J Webb; Deyu Li; Ya-Qiong Xu
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 11.189

10.  Unique electrophysiological and impedance signatures between encapsulation types: An analysis of biological Utah array failure and benefit of a biomimetic coating in a rat model.

Authors:  Patrick A Cody; James R Eles; Carl F Lagenaur; Takashi D Y Kozai; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.