Literature DB >> 15698656

A comparison of chronic multi-channel cortical implantation techniques: manual versus mechanical insertion.

R L Rennaker1, S Street, A M Ruyle, A M Sloan.   

Abstract

High-density multi-channel intra-cortical electrode arrays allow researchers to record simultaneously from populations of neurons for the purpose of understanding neural coding and plasticity. These devices have tens to hundreds of electrodes spaced within a few square millimeters. During insertion, the high-density probes can compress the cortex several millimeters prior to breaking through the pia. Compression of cortical tissue has been demonstrated to result in traumatic brain injury (TBI) which may be a major contributor to low electrode yield and decreased recording longevity. Two insertion techniques for chronically implanting multi-wire electrode arrays in layer IV of primary auditory cortex were compared. A mechanical insertion device, capable of rapidly inserting the electrode array without visible compression of the brain, was constructed. The neural responses to broadband clicks and pure tones recorded from the arrays inserted with the mechanical device were compared to the results from a manual insertion method using a micromanipulator. Both techniques result in a similar number of active channels directly following surgery with a mean signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 4.5. Over 60% of the animals implanted with the mechanical insertion device had driven activity at week 6 whereas none of the animals with manually inserted arrays exhibited functional responses after 3 weeks. This report provides initial evidence that mechanical insertion devices, which prevent cortical compression, increase electrode recording longevity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15698656     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  22 in total

Review 1.  Human cortical prostheses: lost in translation?

Authors:  Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.047

2.  Cortical activity patterns predict speech discrimination ability.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Claudia A Perez; YeTing H Chen; Ryan S Carraway; Amanda C Reed; Jai A Shetake; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Electrophysiological evaluation of a chronically implanted electrode for suprachoroidal transretinal stimulation in rabbit eyes.

Authors:  Kentaro Nishida; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Motohiro Kamei; Toru Saito; Takashi Fujikado; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  A Materials Roadmap to Functional Neural Interface Design.

Authors:  Steven M Wellman; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; John P Seymour; Nicholas J Michelson; William E McFadden; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 18.808

5.  Experimental study on the mechanical interaction between silicon neural microprobes and rat dura mater during insertion.

Authors:  Z Fekete; A Németh; G Márton; I Ulbert; A Pongrácz
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Review: Human Intracortical Recording and Neural Decoding for Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Authors:  David M Brandman; Sydney S Cash; Leigh R Hochberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Chronic in vivo stability assessment of carbon fiber microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Paras R Patel; Huanan Zhang; Matthew T Robbins; Justin B Nofar; Shaun P Marshall; Michael J Kobylarek; Takashi D Y Kozai; Nicholas A Kotov; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Detection and identification of speech sounds using cortical activity patterns.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A M Sloan; A C Reed; C T Engineer; R L Rennaker; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Biocompatibility of intracortical microelectrodes: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Cristina Marin; Eduardo Fernández
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2010-05-28

10.  Sub-meninges implantation reduces immune response to neural implants.

Authors:  Neil T Markwardt; Jodi Stokol; Robert L Rennaker
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.