Literature DB >> 17266019

The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull.

Roy Biran1, Dave C Martin, Patrick A Tresco.   

Abstract

The influence of tethering silicon microelectrode arrays on the cortical brain tissue reaction was compared with that of untethered implants placed in the same location by identical means using immunoflourescent methods and cell type specific markers over indwelling periods of 1-4 weeks. Compared with untethered, freely floating implants, tethered microelectrodes elicited significantly greater reactivity to antibodies against ED1 and GFAP over time. Regardless of implantation method or indwelling time, retrieved microelectrodes contained a layer of attached macrophages identified by positive immunoreactivity against ED1. In the tethered condition and in cases where the tissue surrounding untethered implants had the highest levels of ED1+ and GFAP+ immunoreactivity, the neuronal markers for neurofilament 160 and NeuN were reduced. Although the precise mechanisms are unclear, the present study indicates that simply tethering silicon microelectrode arrays to the skull increases the cortical brain tissue response in the recording zone immediately surrounding the microelectrode array, which signals the importance of identifying this important variable when evaluating the tissue response of different device designs, and suggests that untethered or wireless devices may elicit less of a foreign body response. Copyright 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17266019     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  106 in total

1.  Mechanically adaptive intracortical implants improve the proximity of neuronal cell bodies.

Authors:  J P Harris; J R Capadona; R H Miller; B C Healy; K Shanmuganathan; S J Rowan; C Weder; D J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  The effects of intraspinal microstimulation on spinal cord tissue in the rat.

Authors:  Jeremy A Bamford; Kathryn G Todd; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Three-dimensional macroporous nanoelectronic networks as minimally invasive brain probes.

Authors:  Chong Xie; Jia Liu; Tian-Ming Fu; Xiaochuan Dai; Wei Zhou; Charles M Lieber
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Compliant intracortical implants reduce strains and strain rates in brain tissue in vivo.

Authors:  Arati Sridharan; Jessica K Nguyen; Jeffrey R Capadona; Jit Muthuswamy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  A PDMS-based optical waveguide for transcutaneous powering of microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Ali Ersen; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

6.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Long-term changes in the material properties of brain tissue at the implant-tissue interface.

Authors:  Arati Sridharan; Subramaniam D Rajan; Jit Muthuswamy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Encapsulating Elastically Stretchable Neural Interfaces: Yield, Resolution, and Recording/Stimulation of Neural Activity.

Authors:  Oliver Graudejus; Barclay Morrison; Cezar Goletiani; Zhe Yu; Sigurd Wagner
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 18.808

9.  Chronic intracortical microelectrode arrays induce non-uniform, depth-related tissue responses.

Authors:  Andrew J Woolley; Himanshi A Desai; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Neuroadhesive protein coating improves the chronic performance of neuroelectronics in mouse brain.

Authors:  Asiyeh Golabchi; Kevin M Woeppel; Xia Li; Carl F Lagenaur; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 10.618

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.