Literature DB >> 29421549

Unique electrophysiological and impedance signatures between encapsulation types: An analysis of biological Utah array failure and benefit of a biomimetic coating in a rat model.

Patrick A Cody1, James R Eles1, Carl F Lagenaur2, Takashi D Y Kozai3, X Tracy Cui4.   

Abstract

Intracortical microelectrode arrays, especially the Utah array, remain the most common choice for obtaining high dimensional recordings of spiking neural activity for brain computer interface and basic neuroscience research. Despite the widespread use and established design, mechanical, material and biological challenges persist that contribute to a steady decline in recording performance (as evidenced by both diminished signal amplitude and recorded cell population over time) or outright array failure. Device implantation injury causes acute cell death and activation of inflammatory microglia and astrocytes that leads to a chronic neurodegeneration and inflammatory glial aggregation around the electrode shanks and often times fibrous tissue growth above the pia along the bed of the array within the meninges. This multifaceted deleterious cascade can result in substantial variability in performance even under the same experimental conditions. We track both impedance signatures and electrophysiological performance of 4 × 4 floating microelectrode Utah arrays implanted in the primary monocular visual cortex (V1m) of Long-Evans rats over a 12-week period. We employ a repeatable visual stimulation method to compare signal-to-noise ratio as well as single- and multi-unit yield from weekly recordings. To explain signal variability with biological response, we compare arrays categorized as either Type 1, partial fibrous encapsulation, or Type 2, complete fibrous encapsulation and demonstrate performance and impedance signatures unique to encapsulation type. We additionally assess benefits of a biomolecule coating intended to minimize distance to recordable units and observe a temporary improvement on multi-unit recording yield and single-unit amplitude.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29421549      PMCID: PMC5817007          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  46 in total

1.  Carbon nanotube nanoreservior for controlled release of anti-inflammatory dexamethasone.

Authors:  Xiliang Luo; Christopher Matranga; Susheng Tan; Nicolas Alba; Xinyan T Cui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Reduction of neurovascular damage resulting from microelectrode insertion into the cerebral cortex using in vivo two-photon mapping.

Authors:  T D Y Kozai; T C Marzullo; F Hooi; N B Langhals; A K Majewska; E B Brown; D R Kipke
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Enabling Low-Power, Multi-Modal Neural Interfaces Through a Common, Low-Bandwidth Feature Space.

Authors:  Zachary T Irwin; David E Thompson; Karen E Schroeder; Derek M Tat; Ali Hassani; Autumn J Bullard; Shoshana L Woo; Melanie G Urbanchek; Adam J Sachs; Paul S Cederna; William C Stacey; Parag G Patil; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Seeding neural progenitor cells on silicon-based neural probes.

Authors:  Erdrin Azemi; Glenn T Gobbel; Xinyan Tracy Cui
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  An L1-like molecule, the 8D9 antigen, is a potent substrate for neurite extension.

Authors:  C Lagenaur; V Lemmon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Matrigel coatings for Parylene sheath neural probes.

Authors:  Curtis D Lee; Seth A Hara; Lawrence Yu; Jonathan T W Kuo; Brian J Kim; Tuan Hoang; Victor Pikov; Ellis Meng
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Chronic intracortical microelectrode arrays induce non-uniform, depth-related tissue responses.

Authors:  Andrew J Woolley; Himanshi A Desai; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Effects of caspase-1 knockout on chronic neural recording quality and longevity: insight into cellular and molecular mechanisms of the reactive tissue response.

Authors:  Takashi D Y Kozai; Xia Li; Lance M Bodily; Ellen M Caparosa; Georgios A Zenonos; Diane L Carlisle; Robert M Friedlander; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  The effect of micro-ECoG substrate footprint on the meningeal tissue response.

Authors:  Amelia A Schendel; Michael W Nonte; Corinne Vokoun; Thomas J Richner; Sarah K Brodnick; Farid Atry; Seth Frye; Paige Bostrom; Ramin Pashaie; Sanitta Thongpang; Kevin W Eliceiri; Justin C Williams
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Two-photon imaging of chronically implanted neural electrodes: Sealing methods and new insights.

Authors:  Takashi D Y Kozai; James R Eles; Alberto L Vazquez; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  26 in total

1.  In Vitro/Ex Vivo Investigation of Modified Utah Electrode Array to Selectively Sense and Pace the Sub-Surface Cardiac His Bundle.

Authors:  Ankur R Shah; Muhammad S Khan; Annie M Hirahara; Matthias Lange; Ravi Ranjan; Derek J Dosdall
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-05-07

2.  Toward guiding principles for the design of biologically-integrated electrodes for the central nervous system.

Authors:  Cort H Thompson; Ti'Air E Riggins; Paras R Patel; Cynthia A Chestek; Wen Li; Erin Purcell
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  Understanding the Role of Innate Immunity in the Response to Intracortical Microelectrodes.

Authors:  John K Hermann; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018

4.  Isoflurane and ketamine differentially influence spontaneous and evoked laminar electrophysiology in mouse V1.

Authors:  Nicholas J Michelson; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Meningeal inflammatory response and fibrous tissue remodeling around intracortical implants: An in vivo two-photon imaging study.

Authors:  J R Eles; A L Vazquez; T D Y Kozai; X T Cui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  In vivo imaging of neuronal calcium during electrode implantation: Spatial and temporal mapping of damage and recovery.

Authors:  James R Eles; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Cuprizone-induced oligodendrocyte loss and demyelination impairs recording performance of chronically implanted neural interfaces.

Authors:  Steven M Wellman; Kelly Guzman; Kevin C Stieger; Lauren E Brink; Sadhana Sridhar; Mitchell T Dubaniewicz; Lehong Li; Franca Cambi; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Neuroadhesive protein coating improves the chronic performance of neuroelectronics in mouse brain.

Authors:  Asiyeh Golabchi; Kevin M Woeppel; Xia Li; Carl F Lagenaur; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  In vivo imaging of calcium and glutamate responses to intracortical microstimulation reveals distinct temporal responses of the neuropil and somatic compartments in layer II/III neurons.

Authors:  James R Eles; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  A graphical user interface to assess the neuroinflammatory response to intracortical microelectrodes.

Authors:  Sydney C Lindner; Marina Yu; Jeffrey R Capadona; Andrew J Shoffstall
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.