Literature DB >> 18529185

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission: measurements in humans and simulations with an active cochlear model.

Yong-Sun Choi1, Soo-Young Lee, Kourosh Parham, Stephen T Neely, Duck O Kim.   

Abstract

An efficient method for measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) was developed incorporating (1) stimulus with swept frequency or level and (2) the digital heterodyne analysis. SFOAEs were measured for 550-1450 Hz and stimulus levels of 32-62 dB sound pressure level in eight normal human adults. The mean level, number of peaks, frequency spacing between peaks, phase change, and energy-weighted group delays of SFOAEs were determined. Salient features of the human SFOAEs were stimulated with an active cochlear model containing spatially low-pass filtered irregularity in the impedance. An objective fitting procedure yielded an optimal set of model parameters where, with decreasing stimulus level, the amount of cochlear amplification and the base amplitude of the irregularity increased while the spatial low-pass cutoff and the slope of the spatial low-pass filter decreased. The characteristics of the human cochlea were inferred with the model. In the model, an SFOAE consisted of a long-delay component originating from irregularity in a traveling-wave peak region and a short-delay component originating from irregularity in regions remote from the peak. The results of this study should be useful both for understanding cochlear function and for developing a clinical method of assessing cochlear status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18529185      PMCID: PMC2481564          DOI: 10.1121/1.2902184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  44 in total

1.  Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; C Tong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

Review 4.  Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.

Authors:  John J Guinan; Bradford C Backus; Watjana Lilaonitkul; Vered Aharonson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-13

7.  Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans.

Authors:  D O Kim; P A Dorn; S T Neely; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-03

8.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Robert H Withnell; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  25 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on otoacoustic and neural measures suggest that stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions originate near the peak region of the traveling wave.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-15

2.  Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions using swept tones.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Laura Beshaler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

6.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The spiral staircase: tonotopic microstructure and cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

10.  Nonlinear time-domain cochlear model for transient stimulation and human otoacoustic emission.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Torsten Dau; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.