Literature DB >> 27586670

Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disk corneal topography and optical biometry for intraocular lens power calculation.

Ahmet Kirgiz1, Kurşat Atalay2, Havva Kaldirim2, Kubra Serefoglu Cabuk2, Mehmet Orcun Akdemir3, Muhittin Taskapili4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the keratometry (K) values obtained by the Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disk corneal topography (Sirius) and optical biometry (Lenstar) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation before the cataract surgery, and to evaluate the accuracy of postoperative refraction. 50 eyes of 40 patients were scheduled to have phacoemulsification with the implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. The IOL power was calculated using the SRK/T formula with Lenstar K and K readings from Sirius. Simulated K (SimK), K at 3-, 5-, and 7-mm zones from Sirius were compared with Lenstar K readings. The accuracy of these parameters was determined by calculating the mean absolute error (MAE). The mean Lenstar K value was 44.05 diopters (D) ±1.93 (SD) and SimK, K at 3-, 5-, and 7-mm zones were 43.85 ± 1.91, 43.88 ± 1.9, 43.84 ± 1.9, 43.66 ± 1.85 D, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the K readings (P = 0.901). When Lenstar was used for the corneal power measurements, MAE was 0.42 ± 0.33 D, but when simK of Sirius was used, it was 0.37 ± 0.32 D (the lowest MAE (0.36 ± 0.32 D) was achieved as a result of 5 mm K measurement), but it was not statistically significant (P = 0.892). Of all the K readings of Sirius and Lenstar, Sirius 5-mm zone K readings were the best in predicting a more precise IOL power. The corneal power measurements with the Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disk corneal topography can be safely used for IOL power calculation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intraocular lens power calculation; Optical biometry; Placido-disk corneal topography; Scheimpflug camera

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27586670     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0330-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  25 in total

1.  Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas.

Authors:  Julio Narváez; Grenith Zimmerman; R Doyle Stulting; Daniel H Chang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 2.  Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review.

Authors:  Thomas Olsen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2007-04-02

3.  Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula.

Authors:  J A Retzlaff; D R Sanders; M C Kraff
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera.

Authors:  Giacomo Savini; Piero Barboni; Michele Carbonelli; Kenneth J Hoffer
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL master. A prospective study.

Authors:  E Verhulst; J C Vrijghem
Journal:  Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol       Date:  2001

6.  Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal curvature measurements using the Pentacam and Keratron topography systems.

Authors:  Takushi Kawamorita; Nanami Nakayama; Hiroshi Uozato
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOLMaster biometry.

Authors:  John Landers; Michael Goggin
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Use of Scheimpflug corneal anterior-posterior imaging in ray-tracing intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Kazunori Miyata; Shinichiro Otani; Naoto Honbou; Keiichiro Minami
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.

Authors:  M S Rajan; I Keilhorn; J A Bell
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Repeatability of ocular measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug analyzer in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Carmen Lopez de la Fuente; Ana Sanchez-Cano; Francisco Segura; Lorena Fuentes-Broto; Isabel Pinilla
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Sabong Srivannaboon; Chareenun Chirapapaisan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Biometric Measurement of Anterior Segment: A Review.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Chengwei Kang; Fengzhou Fang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.