Literature DB >> 12194067

Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.

M S Rajan1, I Keilhorn, J A Bell.   

Abstract

AIMS: The purpose of the study was to compare optical biometry based on partial coherence laser interferometry (PCLI) principle to conventional ultrasound biometry in the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations. The role of partial coherence laser interferometry in pseudophakic axial length measurement was analysed in the study.
METHODS: In a prospective randomised clinical trial, 100 patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery were randomised to undergo biometry by either partial coherence laser interferometry (IOL Master) or the applanation ultrasound technique. The IOL material, design and the IOL formula were standardized. The mean error and mean absolute error were calculated and compared using paired t-tests.
RESULTS: One hundred patients were included in this prospective randomised trial, of whom 50 patients underwent optical biometry and 50 patients had biometry by applanation ultrasound. The mean age of patients in the PCLI group was 67 +/- 6 yrs as compared to 71 +/- 8 yrs in the ultrasound group (P > 0.05). The preoperative mean axial length was 23.47 +/- 1.1 mm in the PCLI group (range 20-27.6 mm) and 23.43 +/- 1.2 mm in the ultrasound group with a range of 20.1-27 mm (P > 0.05). The mean absolute error (MAE) in the PCLI group was 0.52 +/- 0.32 D (upper and lower 95% CI 0.62 and 0.42 respectively). The MAE in the ultrasound group was 0.62 +/- 0.4 D (upper and lower CI 0.73 and 0.50 D respectively). Eighty-seven per cent of patients were within +/- 1 D in the PCLI group as compared to 80% in the ultrasound group (P = 0.24). The MAE of axial length difference with optical biometry was 0.13 mm +/- 0.13 SD (range -0.42 to 0.78 mm) in the PCLI group and 0.19 +/- 0.13 mm in the ultrasound group. There was a mean shortening of the eye length in the PCLI group postoperatively. Optical biometry improved the post op refraction by 16% on retrospective IOL power calculations. Eight per cent failed biometry with IOL Master (dense cataracts (4%) and fixation instability due to macular degeneration (4%)).
CONCLUSION: The non contact optical biometry using the partial coherence laser interferometry principle improves the predictive value for postoperative refraction and is a reliable tool in the measurement of intraocular distances in pseudophakic eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12194067     DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  37 in total

1.  IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  H Eleftheriadis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević; Mladen Bušić; Ivan Cima; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Daliborka Miletić
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević; Mladen Bušić; Ivan Cima; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Daliborka Miletić
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comparison of the biometric formulas used for applanation A-scan ultrasound biometry.

Authors:  Fatih Özcura; Serdar Aktaş; Hacı Murat Sağdık; Mehmet Tetikoğlu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Accuracy and reliability of IOL master and A-scan immersion biometry in silicone oil-filled eyes.

Authors:  P Kunavisarut; P Poopattanakul; C Intarated; K Pathanapitoon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry.

Authors:  S Jasvinder; T F Khang; K K S Sarinder; V P Loo; V Subrayan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 7.  Noninsured services provided with insured cataract surgery in Canada: ensuring transparent and fair treatment for patients.

Authors:  Chryssa N McAlister; Iqbal Ike K Ahmed
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disk corneal topography and optical biometry for intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Ahmet Kirgiz; Kurşat Atalay; Havva Kaldirim; Kubra Serefoglu Cabuk; Mehmet Orcun Akdemir; Muhittin Taskapili
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Retinal nerve fiber layer assessment: area versus thickness measurements from elliptical scans centered on the optic nerve.

Authors:  Nimesh B Patel; Xunda Luo; Joe L Wheat; Ronald S Harwerth
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Agreement of IOL power and axial length obtained by IOLMaster 500 vs IOLMaster 500 with Sonolink connection.

Authors:  Sabong Srivannaboon; Chareenun Chirapapaisan; Patchara Nantasri; Mathinee Chongchareon; Pratuangsri Chonpimai
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.