| Literature DB >> 27433471 |
Johannes A Eckert1, Ulrike Mueller1, Sebastian Jaeger1, Benjamin Panzram1, J Philippe Kretzer1.
Abstract
Tribocorrosion in taper junctions of retrieved anatomic shoulder arthroplasty implants was evaluated. A comparison of the tribocorrosion between cobalt-chromium and titanium alloy stems was conducted and the observations were correlated with the individual's clinical data. Adverse effects caused by metal debris and subsequent elevated serum metal ion levels are frequently reported in total hip arthroplasty. In total shoulder arthroplasty, to date only a small number of retrieval analyses are available and even fewer address the issue of tribocorrosion at the taper junctions. A total of 36 retrieved hemiarthroplasties and total shoulder arthroplasties were assessed using the modified Goldberg score. The prevalence of fretting and corrosion was confirmed in this cohort. Titanium stems seem to be more susceptible to damage caused by tribocorrosion than cobalt-chromium stems. Furthermore, stemless designs offered less tribocorrosion at the taper junction than stemmed designs. A weak correlation between time to revision and increased levels of tribocorrosion was seen. Whether or not tribocorrosion can lead to adverse clinical reactions and causes failure of shoulder arthroplasties remains to be examined.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27433471 PMCID: PMC4940522 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1695906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Distribution of material and fixation among the retrieved components.
Figure 2Analyzed types of shoulder implants: two different stems types were analyzed: retrieved stems had either a male (a) or a female (b) taper.
Patient demographics of the 36 retrievals.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Number of patients | 36 |
| Age, in years | 68 ± 11 (45–86) |
| Sex | |
| Female | 26 (72%) |
| Male | 10 (28%) |
| Time to revision, in years | 3.7 ± 3.9 (0.03–13.5) |
| Side | |
| Left | 13 (36%) |
| Right | 23 (64%) |
| BMI, in kg/m2 | 28.7 ± 5.8 (18.4–43.6) |
Reasons for revision and distribution.
| Reasons for revision | Total | TSA | HA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infection | 9 (25%) | 1 (14%) | 8 (28%) |
| Instability | 15 (42%) | 2 (29%) | 13 (45%) |
| Aseptic loosening | 5 (14%) | 2 (29%) | 3 (10%) |
| Progression of osteoarthritis | 5 (14%) | 1 (14%) | 4 (14%) |
| Periprosthetic fracture | 2 (6%) | 1 (14%) | 1 (3%) |
The modified Goldberg score [9] according to Cusick et al. [11].
| Damage | Score | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Minimal | 1 | Fretting on <10% of the surface and no corrosion damage |
| Mild | 2 | Fretting on >10% of the surface and/or corrosion attack confined to one or small areas |
| Moderate | 3 | Fretting on >30% of the surface and/or aggressive local corrosion attack with corrosion debris |
| Severe | 4 | Damage over the majority (>50%) of the surface with severe corrosion attack and abundant corrosion debris |
Figure 3Severe tribocorrosion on male (a) and female (b) taper of a retrieved prosthesis. The time to revision was 9.2 years.
Figure 4Minimal tribocorrosion on male (a) and female (b) taper of a retrieved prosthesis. This prosthesis was implanted for 8.8 years.
Figure 5Comparison of the damage scores for the head and stem taper depending on stem material. Heads are all made of CoCr.
Figure 6Comparison of the damage scores for the head and stem taper depending on stem design. Only titanium stems are included.
Spearman's correlation coefficients for the damage scores depending on clinical data (n = 36).
| Stem taper | Head taper | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Time to revision | 0.165 | 0.335 | 0.460 | 0.005 |
| BMI | 0.038 | 0.827 | 0.154 | 0.371 |
| Age | 0.089 | 0.606 | −0.175 | 0.309 |