Literature DB >> 24928271

[Implementation of the EndoCert system for certification of arthroplasty centers. Experiences from the pilot phase].

H Haas1, W Mittelmeier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: EndoCert is an initiative of the Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie (DGOOC, German Society for Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery) which has been available since October 2012 and is the first system worldwide for certification of specialized arthroplasty centers. Before implementation of this certification concept two sequential pilot phases were carried out with representative treatment institutions. The results from these pilot clinics are presented with respect to quality improvement effects. NONCONFORMITIES: Early effects on the quality of treatment have been achieved by rectification of nonconformities determined in the audit with respect to structural and process quality. A total of 172 nonconformities found in the 23 participating pilot clinics could be rectified. Long-term effects on the quality of results will in future be analyzed in cooperation with the German endoprosthesis register (EPRD) and by accompanying evaluations. FEEDBACK: A close feedback of the collated experiences and results to the certification committee, which is responsible for the procedure together with the DGOOC, allows continuous further development of the system
CONCLUSION: EndoCert represents a substantial step towards a nationwide safety and improvement of the quality in arthroplasty treatment within the preoperative, perioperative and postoperative framework and can in future represent a decisive tool together with the EPRD in quality management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24928271     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-014-2294-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  9 in total

Review 1.  The effect of provider case volume on cancer mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Russell L Gruen; Veronica Pitt; Sally Green; Anne Parkhill; Donald Campbell; Damien Jolley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Are breast cancer patients better of with a high volume provider?

Authors:  G A Gooiker; W van Gijn; P N Post; C J H van de Velde; R A E M Tollenaar; M W J M Wouters
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Simon Jameson; Rebecca Critchley; Mike Reed; Paul Gregg; David Deehan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The effects of clinical pathways on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay, and hospital costs: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Rotter; Leigh Kinsman; Erica James; Andreas Machotta; Jon Willis; Pamela Snow; Joachim Kugler
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.

Authors:  H S Luft; J P Bunker; A C Enthoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Impact of surgeon volume on outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Archampong; D W Borowski; H O Dickinson
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 2.392

7.  [Certified medical centers--A measurable benefit to patients?!].

Authors:  Maria Eberlein-Gonska; Sebastian Schellong; Michael Baumann
Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich       Date:  2007

8.  Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Barbieri; K Vanhaecht; P Van Herck; W Sermeus; F Faggiano; S Marchisio; M Panella
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of clinical pathways on length of stay, hospital costs and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas Rotter; Joachim Kugler; Rainer Koch; Holger Gothe; Sabine Twork; Jeroen M van Oostrum; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  [Does the certification according to EndoCert lead to a better quality of treatment?]

Authors:  P Weber; A C Paulus; D Hallmen; A Steinbrück; F Schmidutz; V Jansson
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Complications and costs in primary knee replacement surgery in an endoprosthetics centre : Influence of state of training].

Authors:  C Windisch; S Brodt; E Röhner; G Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Quality criteria in arthroplasty].

Authors:  Max Jaenisch; Karl Dieter Heller; Dieter Christian Wirtz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  [Registries of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma : Overview and perspectives of the DGU and DGOOC registries].

Authors:  T Kostuj; B Kladny; R Hoffmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  [Hip fracture prosthetics in German trauma surgery. State of the art].

Authors:  P C Strohm; M Raschke; R Hoffmann; C Josten
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Fretting and Corrosion in Modular Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis.

Authors:  Johannes A Eckert; Ulrike Mueller; Sebastian Jaeger; Benjamin Panzram; J Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.