Literature DB >> 27379501

A pose prediction approach based on ligand 3D shape similarity.

Ashutosh Kumar1, Kam Y J Zhang2.   

Abstract

Molecular docking predicts the best pose of a ligand in the target protein binding site by sampling and scoring numerous conformations and orientations of the ligand. Failures in pose prediction are often due to either insufficient sampling or scoring function errors. To improve the accuracy of pose prediction by tackling the sampling problem, we have developed a method of pose prediction using shape similarity. It first places a ligand conformation of the highest 3D shape similarity with known crystal structure ligands into protein binding site and then refines the pose by repacking the side-chains and performing energy minimization with a Monte Carlo algorithm. We have assessed our method utilizing CSARdock 2012 and 2014 benchmark exercise datasets consisting of co-crystal structures from eight proteins. Our results revealed that ligand 3D shape similarity could substitute conformational and orientational sampling if at least one suitable co-crystal structure is available. Our method identified poses within 2 Å RMSD as the top-ranking pose for 85.7 % of the test cases. The median RMSD for our pose prediction method was found to be 0.81 Å and was better than methods performing extensive conformational and orientational sampling within target protein binding sites. Furthermore, our method was better than similar methods utilizing ligand 3D shape similarity for pose prediction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Molecular docking; Pose prediction; Shape similarity; Virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27379501     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9923-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  78 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Expanded interaction fingerprint method for analyzing ligand binding modes in docking and structure-based drug design.

Authors:  Matthew D Kelly; Ricardo L Mancera
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

4.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 5.  Structure-based drug screening and ligand-based drug screening with machine learning.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Fukunishi
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.339

6.  Knowledge-Based Strategy to Improve Ligand Pose Prediction Accuracy for Lead Optimization.

Authors:  Cen Gao; Nels Thorsteinson; Ian Watson; Jibo Wang; Michal Vieth
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  POSIT: Flexible Shape-Guided Docking For Pose Prediction.

Authors:  Brian P Kelley; Scott P Brown; Gregory L Warren; Steven W Muchmore
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Conformer generation with OMEGA: learning from the data set and the analysis of failures.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.

Authors:  Ann E Cleves; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Integration of ligand-based drug screening with structure-based drug screening by combining maximum volume overlapping score with ligand docking.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Fukunishi; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-04
View more
  8 in total

1.  Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Biased Docking for Protein-Ligand Pose Prediction.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Arcon; Adrián G Turjanski; Marcelo A Martí; Stefano Forli
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  A cross docking pipeline for improving pose prediction and virtual screening performance.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  D3R Grand Challenge 3: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses and affinity rankings.

Authors:  Zied Gaieb; Conor D Parks; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Chenghua Shao; W Patrick Walters; Millard H Lambert; Neysa Nevins; Scott D Bembenek; Michael K Ameriks; Tara Mirzadegan; Stephen K Burley; Rommie E Amaro; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Advances in the Development of Shape Similarity Methods and Their Application in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.221

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.