Literature DB >> 31463704

Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.

Ashutosh Kumar1, Kam Y J Zhang2.   

Abstract

In order to improve the pose prediction performance of docking methods, we have previously developed the pose prediction using shape similarity (PoPSS) method. It identifies a ligand conformation of the highest shape similarity with target protein crystal ligands. The identified ligand conformation is then placed into the target protein binding pocket and refined using side-chain repacking and Monte Carlo energy minimization. Subsequently, we have reported a modification to PoPSS, named as PoPSS-Lite, using a simple grid-based energy minimization for side-chain repacking and Tversky correlation coefficient as the similarity metric. This modification has improved the pose prediction performance and PoPSS-Lite was one of the top performers in D3R GC3. Here we report a further modification to PoPSS that utilizes a continuum solvent model to account for water mediated protein ligand interactions. In this approach, named as PoPSS-PB, the ligand conformation of the highest shape similarity with crystal ligands is refined along with the target protein binding site by incorporating the Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics. The performance of PoPSS-PB along with PoPSS and PoPSS-Lite was prospectively evaluated in D3R GC4. PoPSS-PB not only demonstrated excellent performance with mean and median RMSDs of 1.20 and 1.13 Å but also achieved improved performance over PoPSS and PoPSS-Lite. Furthermore, the comparison with other D3R GC4 pose prediction submissions revealed admirable performance. Our results showed that the binding poses of ligands with unknown binding modes can be successfully predicted by utilizing ligand 3D shape similarity with known crystallographic ligands and that taking the solvation into consideration improves pose prediction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D3R; D3R Grand Challenge 4; Drug design data resource; Ligand 3D shape similarity; Molecular docking; Pose prediction

Year:  2019        PMID: 31463704     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-019-00220-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  35 in total

1.  Binding estimation after refinement, a new automated procedure for the refinement and rescoring of docked ligands in virtual screening.

Authors:  Giulio Rastelli; Gianluca Degliesposti; Alberto Del Rio; Miriam Sgobba
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.817

Review 2.  Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yuriev; Mark Agostino; Paul A Ramsland
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.137

3.  Conformer generation with OMEGA: learning from the data set and the analysis of failures.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 4.  Latest developments in molecular docking: 2010-2011 in review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yuriev; Paul A Ramsland
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.137

5.  Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  D3R Grand Challenge 2: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies.

Authors:  Zied Gaieb; Shuai Liu; Symon Gathiaka; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Chenghua Shao; Victoria A Feher; W Patrick Walters; Bernd Kuhn; Markus G Rudolph; Stephen K Burley; Michael K Gilson; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Improving Accuracy, Diversity, and Speed with Prime Macrocycle Conformational Sampling.

Authors:  Dan Sindhikara; Steven A Spronk; Tyler Day; Ken Borrelli; Daniel L Cheney; Shana L Posy
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 8.  The importance of discerning shape in molecular pharmacology.

Authors:  Sandhya Kortagere; Matthew D Krasowski; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 14.819

9.  Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments.

Authors:  Martyn D Winn; Charles C Ballard; Kevin D Cowtan; Eleanor J Dodson; Paul Emsley; Phil R Evans; Ronan M Keegan; Eugene B Krissinel; Andrew G W Leslie; Airlie McCoy; Stuart J McNicholas; Garib N Murshudov; Navraj S Pannu; Elizabeth A Potterton; Harold R Powell; Randy J Read; Alexei Vagin; Keith S Wilson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-03-18

10.  RCSB Protein Data Bank: biological macromolecular structures enabling research and education in fundamental biology, biomedicine, biotechnology and energy.

Authors:  Stephen K Burley; Helen M Berman; Charmi Bhikadiya; Chunxiao Bi; Li Chen; Luigi Di Costanzo; Cole Christie; Ken Dalenberg; Jose M Duarte; Shuchismita Dutta; Zukang Feng; Sutapa Ghosh; David S Goodsell; Rachel K Green; Vladimir Guranovic; Dmytro Guzenko; Brian P Hudson; Tara Kalro; Yuhe Liang; Robert Lowe; Harry Namkoong; Ezra Peisach; Irina Periskova; Andreas Prlic; Chris Randle; Alexander Rose; Peter Rose; Raul Sala; Monica Sekharan; Chenghua Shao; Lihua Tan; Yi-Ping Tao; Yana Valasatava; Maria Voigt; John Westbrook; Jesse Woo; Huanwang Yang; Jasmine Young; Marina Zhuravleva; Christine Zardecki
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.