Literature DB >> 30632055

D3R Grand Challenge 3: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses and affinity rankings.

Zied Gaieb1, Conor D Parks1, Michael Chiu1, Huanwang Yang2, Chenghua Shao2, W Patrick Walters3, Millard H Lambert4, Neysa Nevins4, Scott D Bembenek5, Michael K Ameriks5, Tara Mirzadegan5, Stephen K Burley2,6, Rommie E Amaro7, Michael K Gilson8.   

Abstract

The Drug Design Data Resource aims to test and advance the state of the art in protein-ligand modeling by holding community-wide blinded, prediction challenges. Here, we report on our third major round, Grand Challenge 3 (GC3). Held 2017-2018, GC3 centered on the protein Cathepsin S and the kinases VEGFR2, JAK2, p38-α, TIE2, and ABL1, and included both pose-prediction and affinity-ranking components. GC3 was structured much like the prior challenges GC2015 and GC2. First, Stage 1 tested pose prediction and affinity ranking methods; then all available crystal structures were released, and Stage 2 tested only affinity rankings, now in the context of the available structures. Unique to GC3 was the addition of a Stage 1b self-docking subchallenge, in which the protein coordinates from all of the cocrystal structures used in the cross-docking challenge were released, and participants were asked to predict the pose of CatS ligands using these newly released structures. We provide an overview of the outcomes and discuss insights into trends and best-practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blinded prediction challenge; D3R; Docking; Drug Design Data Resource; Ligand ranking; Scoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30632055      PMCID: PMC6472484          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0180-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  38 in total

Review 1.  The many roles of computation in drug discovery.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Protein kinases: docking and homology modeling reliability.

Authors:  Tiziano Tuccinardi; Maurizio Botta; Antonio Giordano; Adriano Martinelli
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 4.  Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps.

Authors:  Andrew R Leach; Brian K Shoichet; Catherine E Peishoff
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance.

Authors:  Michael J Hartshorn; Marcel L Verdonk; Gianni Chessari; Suzanne C Brewerton; Wijnand T M Mooij; Paul N Mortenson; Christopher W Murray
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 6.  Docking Screens for Novel Ligands Conferring New Biology.

Authors:  John J Irwin; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  POSIT: Flexible Shape-Guided Docking For Pose Prediction.

Authors:  Brian P Kelley; Scott P Brown; Gregory L Warren; Steven W Muchmore
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Lessons Learned over Four Benchmark Exercises from the Community Structure-Activity Resource.

Authors:  Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Protein docking refinement by convex underestimation in the low-dimensional subspace of encounter complexes.

Authors:  Shahrooz Zarbafian; Mohammad Moghadasi; Athar Roshandelpoor; Feng Nan; Keyong Li; Pirooz Vakli; Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  42 in total

1.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Blinded prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity using Amber thermodynamic integration for the 2018 D3R grand challenge 4.

Authors:  Junjie Zou; Chuan Tian; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Comparison of affinity ranking using AutoDock-GPU and MM-GBSA scores for BACE-1 inhibitors in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Léa El Khoury; Diogo Santos-Martins; Sukanya Sasmal; Jérôme Eberhardt; Giulia Bianco; Francesca Alessandra Ambrosio; Leonardo Solis-Vasquez; Andreas Koch; Stefano Forli; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  D3R Grand Challenge 4: prospective pose prediction of BACE1 ligands with AutoDock-GPU.

Authors:  Diogo Santos-Martins; Jerome Eberhardt; Giulia Bianco; Leonardo Solis-Vasquez; Francesca Alessandra Ambrosio; Andreas Koch; Stefano Forli
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Generative network complex (GNC) for drug discovery.

Authors:  Christopher Grow; Kaifu Gao; Duc Duy Nguyen; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  Commun Inf Syst       Date:  2019

7.  Cross-docking benchmark for automated pose and ranking prediction of ligand binding.

Authors:  Shayne D Wierbowski; Bentley M Wingert; Jim Zheng; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Docking rigid macrocycles using Convex-PL, AutoDock Vina, and RDKit in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Vladimir Chupin; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Impact of the Protein Data Bank on antineoplastic approvals.

Authors:  John D Westbrook; Rose Soskind; Brian P Hudson; Stephen K Burley
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 10.  A review of mathematical representations of biomolecular data.

Authors:  Duc Duy Nguyen; Zixuan Cang; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.