Literature DB >> 30084081

Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Ashutosh Kumar1, Kam Y J Zhang2.   

Abstract

To extend the utility of ligand 3D shape similarity into pose prediction and virtual screening, we have previously developed CDVS and PoPSS methods. Both of them utilize ligand 3D shape similarity with the crystallographic ligands to improve pose prediction. While CDVS utilizes shape similarity to select suitable receptor structures for molecular docking, PoPSS places a ligand conformation of the highest shape similarity with crystal ligands into the target protein binding pocket which is then refined by side-chain repacking and Monte Carlo energy minimization. Analyses of PoPSS revealed some drawbacks in ligand conformation generation and the scoring scheme used. Moreover, as PoPSS does not sample the ligand conformation after placing it in the binding pocket, it relies solely on conformation generation methods to produce native like conformations. To address these limitations of PoPSS method, we report here a modified approach named as PoPSS-Lite, where side-chain repacking was replaced by a simple grid-based energy minimization. This modification also allowed the sampling of terminal functional groups while keeping the core scaffold fixed. Furthermore, shape similarity calculations were improved by increasing the number of ligand conformations and using a different similarity metric. The performance of PoPSS-Lite was prospectively evaluated in D3R GC3. Comparison of PoPSS-Lite demonstrated superior performance over PoPSS and CDVS with lower mean and median RMSDs. Furthermore, comparison with other D3R GC3 pose prediction submissions revealed top performance for PoPSS-Lite. Our D3R GC3 result extends our perspective that ligand 3D shape similarity with known crystallographic information can be successfully used to predict the binding pose of ligands with unknown binding modes. Our D3R GC3 results further highlight the necessity for improvement in conformer generation methods in order to improve shape similarity guided pose prediction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D3R; D3R Grand Challenge 3; Drug Design Data Resource; Ligand 3D shape similarity; Molecular docking; Pose prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30084081     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0142-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  58 in total

1.  FRED and HYBRID docking performance on standardized datasets.

Authors:  Mark McGann
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  HybridDock: A Hybrid Protein-Ligand Docking Protocol Integrating Protein- and Ligand-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Min Li; Jianxin Wang; Yi Pan
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  Conformation Generation: The State of the Art.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Shape-based virtual screening, synthesis and evaluation of novel pyrrolone derivatives as antiviral agents against HCV.

Authors:  Marcella Bassetto; Pieter Leyssen; Johan Neyts; Mark M Yerukhimovich; David N Frick; Andrea Brancale
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Discovery, design and synthesis of 6H-anthra[1,9-cd]isoxazol-6-one scaffold as G9a inhibitor through a combination of shape-based virtual screening and structure-based molecular modification.

Authors:  Wei-Lin Chen; Zhi-Hui Wang; Tao-Tao Feng; Dong-Dong Li; Chu-Hui Wang; Xiao-Li Xu; Xiao-Jin Zhang; Qi-Dong You; Xiao-Ke Guo
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Conformer generation with OMEGA: learning from the data set and the analysis of failures.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 7.  The importance of discerning shape in molecular pharmacology.

Authors:  Sandhya Kortagere; Matthew D Krasowski; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 14.819

8.  Identification of new SUMO activating enzyme 1 inhibitors using virtual screening and scaffold hopping.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Akihiro Ito; Mikako Hirohama; Minoru Yoshida; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  RosettaScripts: a scripting language interface to the Rosetta macromolecular modeling suite.

Authors:  Sarel J Fleishman; Andrew Leaver-Fay; Jacob E Corn; Eva-Maria Strauch; Sagar D Khare; Nobuyasu Koga; Justin Ashworth; Paul Murphy; Florian Richter; Gordon Lemmon; Jens Meiler; David Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Rosetta All-Atom Energy Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Design.

Authors:  Rebecca F Alford; Andrew Leaver-Fay; Jeliazko R Jeliazkov; Matthew J O'Meara; Frank P DiMaio; Hahnbeom Park; Maxim V Shapovalov; P Douglas Renfrew; Vikram K Mulligan; Kalli Kappel; Jason W Labonte; Michael S Pacella; Richard Bonneau; Philip Bradley; Roland L Dunbrack; Rhiju Das; David Baker; Brian Kuhlman; Tanja Kortemme; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  5 in total

1.  Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Docking rigid macrocycles using Convex-PL, AutoDock Vina, and RDKit in the D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Vladimir Chupin; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Exploring fragment-based target-specific ranking protocol with machine learning on cathepsin S.

Authors:  Yuwei Yang; Jianing Lu; Chao Yang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  D3R Grand Challenge 4: ligand similarity and MM-GBSA-based pose prediction and affinity ranking for BACE-1 inhibitors.

Authors:  Sukanya Sasmal; Léa El Khoury; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  D3R grand challenge 4: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies.

Authors:  Conor D Parks; Zied Gaieb; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Chenghua Shao; W Patrick Walters; Johanna M Jansen; Georgia McGaughey; Richard A Lewis; Scott D Bembenek; Michael K Ameriks; Tara Mirzadegan; Stephen K Burley; Rommie E Amaro; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.