Literature DB >> 27484214

Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Ashutosh Kumar1, Kam Y J Zhang2.   

Abstract

Evaluation of ligand three-dimensional (3D) shape similarity is one of the commonly used approaches to identify ligands similar to one or more known active compounds from a library of small molecules. Apart from using ligand shape similarity as a virtual screening tool, its role in pose prediction and pose scoring has also been reported. We have recently developed a method that utilizes ligand 3D shape similarity with known crystallographic ligands to predict binding poses of query ligands. Here, we report the prospective evaluation of our pose prediction method through the participation in drug design data resource (D3R) Grand Challenge 2015. Our pose prediction method was used to predict binding poses of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) and mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase (MAP4K4) ligands and it was able to predict the pose within 2 Å root mean square deviation (RMSD) either as the top pose or among the best of five poses in a majority of cases. Specifically for HSP90 protein, a median RMSD of 0.73 and 0.68 Å was obtained for the top and the best of five predictions respectively. For MAP4K4 target, although the median RMSD for our top prediction was only 2.87 Å but the median RMSD of 1.67 Å for the best of five predictions was well within the limit for successful prediction. Furthermore, the performance of our pose prediction method for HSP90 and MAP4K4 ligands was always among the top five groups. Particularly, for MAP4K4 protein our pose prediction method was ranked number one both in terms of mean and median RMSD when the best of five predictions were considered. Overall, our D3R Grand Challenge 2015 results demonstrated that ligand 3D shape similarity with the crystal ligand is sufficient to predict binding poses of new ligands with acceptable accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D3R Grand Challenge 2015; Molecular docking; Pose prediction; Shape similarity; Virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27484214     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9931-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  61 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Structure-based drug screening and ligand-based drug screening with machine learning.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Fukunishi
Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.339

4.  POSIT: Flexible Shape-Guided Docking For Pose Prediction.

Authors:  Brian P Kelley; Scott P Brown; Gregory L Warren; Steven W Muchmore
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Conformer generation with OMEGA: learning from the data set and the analysis of failures.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Setting the record straight: the origin of the pharmacophore concept.

Authors:  Osman F Güner; J Phillip Bowen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Molecular shape and medicinal chemistry: a perspective.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls; Georgia B McGaughey; Robert P Sheridan; Andrew C Good; Gregory Warren; Magali Mathieu; Steven W Muchmore; Scott P Brown; J Andrew Grant; James A Haigh; Neysa Nevins; Ajay N Jain; Brian Kelley
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  Integration of ligand-based drug screening with structure-based drug screening by combining maximum volume overlapping score with ligand docking.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Fukunishi; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2012-12-04

10.  A rotation-translation invariant molecular descriptor of partial charges and its use in ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Francois Berenger; Arnout Voet; Xiao Yin Lee; Kam Yj Zhang
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.514

View more
  6 in total

1.  Improving ligand 3D shape similarity-based pose prediction with a continuum solvent model.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Improving small molecule virtual screening strategies for the next generation of therapeutics.

Authors:  Bentley M Wingert; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2018-06-17       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Advances in the Development of Shape Similarity Methods and Their Application in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.221

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.