Literature DB >> 28836076

A cross docking pipeline for improving pose prediction and virtual screening performance.

Ashutosh Kumar1, Kam Y J Zhang2.   

Abstract

Pose prediction and virtual screening performance of a molecular docking method depend on the choice of protein structures used for docking. Multiple structures for a target protein are often used to take into account the receptor flexibility and problems associated with a single receptor structure. However, the use of multiple receptor structures is computationally expensive when docking a large library of small molecules. Here, we propose a new cross-docking pipeline suitable to dock a large library of molecules while taking advantage of multiple target protein structures. Our method involves the selection of a suitable receptor for each ligand in a screening library utilizing ligand 3D shape similarity with crystallographic ligands. We have prospectively evaluated our method in D3R Grand Challenge 2 and demonstrated that our cross-docking pipeline can achieve similar or better performance than using either single or multiple-receptor structures. Moreover, our method displayed not only decent pose prediction performance but also better virtual screening performance over several other methods.

Keywords:  D3R; D3R Grand Challenge 2; Drug Design Data Resource; Molecular docking; Pose prediction; Shape similarity; Virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836076     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-017-0048-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  50 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Robert B Murphy; Matthew P Repasky; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Thomas A Halgren; Paul C Sanschagrin; Daniel T Mainz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.

Authors:  Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 5.  Computational approaches for fragment-based and de novo design.

Authors:  Kathryn Loving; Ian Alberts; Woody Sherman
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yuriev; Mark Agostino; Paul A Ramsland
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.137

7.  Conformer generation with OMEGA: learning from the data set and the analysis of failures.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Inexpensive Method for Selecting Receptor Structures for Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Zunnan Huang; Chung F Wong
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Systematic exploitation of multiple receptor conformations for virtual ligand screening.

Authors:  Giovanni Bottegoni; Walter Rocchia; Manuel Rueda; Ruben Abagyan; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  A facile consensus ranking approach enhances virtual screening robustness and identifies a cell-active DYRK1α inhibitor.

Authors:  Maria E Mavrogeni; Filippos Pronios; Danae Zareifi; Sofia Vasilakaki; Olivier Lozach; Leonidas Alexopoulos; Laurent Meijer; Vassilios Myrianthopoulos; Emmanuel Mikros
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.808

2.  Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Continuous Evaluation of Ligand Protein Predictions: A Weekly Community Challenge for Drug Docking.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Wagner; Christopher P Churas; Shuai Liu; Robert V Swift; Michael Chiu; Chenghua Shao; Victoria A Feher; Stephen K Burley; Michael K Gilson; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Development of an Automatic Pipeline for Participation in the CELPP Challenge.

Authors:  Marina Miñarro-Lleonar; Sergio Ruiz-Carmona; Daniel Alvarez-Garcia; Peter Schmidtke; Xavier Barril
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  D3R grand challenge 4: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies.

Authors:  Conor D Parks; Zied Gaieb; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Chenghua Shao; W Patrick Walters; Johanna M Jansen; Georgia McGaughey; Richard A Lewis; Scott D Bembenek; Michael K Ameriks; Tara Mirzadegan; Stephen K Burley; Rommie E Amaro; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 6.  Advances in the Development of Shape Similarity Methods and Their Application in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 7.  Molecular Docking: Shifting Paradigms in Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Luca Pinzi; Giulio Rastelli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.