Literature DB >> 19442067

Structure-based drug screening and ligand-based drug screening with machine learning.

Yoshifumi Fukunishi1.   

Abstract

The initial stage of drug development is the hit (active) compound search from a pool of millions of compounds; for this process, in silico (virtual) screening has been successfully applied. One of the problems of in silico screening, however, is the low hit ratio in relation to the high computational cost and the long CPU time. This problem becomes serious in structure-based in silico screening. The major reason is the low accuracy of the estimation of protein-compound binding free energy. The problem of ligand-based in silico screening is that the conventional quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) approach is not effective at predicting new hit compounds with new scaffolds. Recently, machine-learning approaches have been applied to in silico drug screening to overcome the above problems. We review here machine-learning approaches for both structure-based and ligand-based drug screening. Machine learning is used to improve database enrichment in two ways, namely by improving the docking score calculated by the protein-compound docking program and by calculating the optimal distance between the feature vectors of active and inactive compounds. Both approaches require compounds that are known to be active with respect to the target protein. In structure-based screening, the former approach is mainly used with a protein-compound affinity matrix. In ligand-based screening, both the former and latter approaches are used, and the latter approach can be applied to various kinds of descriptors, such as 1D/2D descriptors/fingerprints and the affinity fingerprint given by the protein-compound affinity matrix.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19442067     DOI: 10.2174/138620709788167890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comb Chem High Throughput Screen        ISSN: 1386-2073            Impact factor:   1.339


  10 in total

Review 1.  Computational methods in drug discovery.

Authors:  Gregory Sliwoski; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Jens Meiler; Edward W Lowe
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  LBVS: an online platform for ligand-based virtual screening using publicly accessible databases.

Authors:  Minghao Zheng; Zhihong Liu; Xin Yan; Qianzhi Ding; Qiong Gu; Jun Xu
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Prospective evaluation of shape similarity based pose prediction method in D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A pose prediction approach based on ligand 3D shape similarity.

Authors:  Ashutosh Kumar; Kam Y J Zhang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Free-energy landscape of molecular interactions between endothelin 1 and human endothelin type B receptor: fly-casting mechanism.

Authors:  Junichi Higo; Kota Kasahara; Mitsuhito Wada; Bhaskar Dasgupta; Narutoshi Kamiya; Tomonori Hayami; Ikuo Fukuda; Yoshifumi Fukunishi; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 1.650

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence and machine-learning approaches in structure and ligand-based discovery of drugs affecting central nervous system.

Authors:  Vertika Gautam; Anand Gaurav; Neeraj Masand; Vannajan Sanghiran Lee; Vaishali M Patil
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.364

Review 7.  Current progress in Structure-Based Rational Drug Design marks a new mindset in drug discovery.

Authors:  Valère Lounnas; Tina Ritschel; Jan Kelder; Ross McGuire; Robert P Bywater; Nicolas Foloppe
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 7.271

8.  Similarity-Based Virtual Screen Using Enhanced Siamese Deep Learning Methods.

Authors:  Mohammed Khaldoon Altalib; Naomie Salim
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-02-03

9.  SimCAL: a flexible tool to compute biochemical reaction similarity.

Authors:  Tadi Venkata Sivakumar; Anirban Bhaduri; Rajasekhara Reddy Duvvuru Muni; Jin Hwan Park; Tae Yong Kim
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  How Sure Can We Be about ML Methods-Based Evaluation of Compound Activity: Incorporation of Information about Prediction Uncertainty Using Deep Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Igor Sieradzki; Damian Leśniak; Sabina Podlewska
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.