| Literature DB >> 27324157 |
Kerstin Göpfrich1, Chen-Yu Li2, Iwona Mames3, Satya Prathyusha Bhamidimarri4, Maria Ricci1, Jejoong Yoo2, Adam Mames3, Alexander Ohmann1, Mathias Winterhalter4, Eugen Stulz3, Aleksei Aksimentiev2, Ulrich F Keyser1.
Abstract
Because of their hollow interior, transmembrane channels are capable of opening up pathways for ions across lipid membranes of living cells. Here, we demonstrate ion conduction induced by a single DNA duplex that lacks a hollow central channel. Decorated with six porpyrin-tags, our duplex is designed to span lipid membranes. Combining electrophysiology measurements with all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, we elucidate the microscopic conductance pathway. Ions flow at the DNA-lipid interface as the lipid head groups tilt toward the amphiphilic duplex forming a toroidal pore filled with water and ions. Ionic current traces produced by the DNA-lipid channel show well-defined insertion steps, closures, and gating similar to those observed for traditional protein channels or synthetic pores. Ionic conductances obtained through simulations and experiments are in excellent quantitative agreement. The conductance mechanism realized here with the smallest possible DNA-based ion channel offers a route to design a new class of synthetic ion channels with maximum simplicity.Entities:
Keywords: DNA nanotechnology; lipid membrane; molecular dynamics; porphyrin; synthetic ion channel
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27324157 PMCID: PMC4948918 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nano Lett ISSN: 1530-6984 Impact factor: 11.189
Figure 1Design, shape, and dimensions of the membrane-spanning DNA duplex. (A) Envisioned placement and conductance mechanism of the DNA duplex (blue) decorated with six porphyrin membrane anchors (red, only three shown in cross section) causing the formation of a toroidal lipid pore (yellow). The sketch is roughly drawn to scale. (B) The nucleotide sequence of the duplex. The locations of the porphyrin tags within the sequence are indicated in red. The bottom row shows the chemical structures of the tags labeled as 1 (with acetylene linker) and 2 (with amide linker) according to the target strand. (C) AFM images of the duplex structures adsorbed onto mica and imaged in air.
Figure 2Fluorescent confocal images (excitation wavelength: 514 nm) of DphPC lipid vesicles after addition of (A) the porphyrin-tagged duplex, c = 5 nM and (B) a duplex with two Cy3-tags but no porphyrin tags, c = 5 nM (negative control).
Figure 3Ionic current recordings of the porphyrin-tagged duplex in 1 M KCl, 10 mM MES, pH 6.0. Exemplary current traces showing (A) an insertion at 50 mV, (B) two consequtive closure steps at 50 mV, and (C) gating behavior at 100 mV. (D) Histogram of conductance steps obtained from current traces of the duplex. The dashed line represents a Gaussian fit which peaks at 80 pS. (E) Current–voltage characteristics of stable insertions of the duplex. Error bars correspond to the standard deviation of 8 independent recordings. The dashed line represents a linear fit.
Figure 4MD simulations of the duplex-induced DLC. (A) All-atom models of the duplex with hydrophobic tags (red) embedded in a lipid membrane (green) before equilibration. The system contains magnesium ions in an amount sufficient to neutralize the electrical charge of the duplex and 1 M KCl solution (not shown). Total system size: 140 630 atoms. Electric field E in direction of positive transmembrane bias is indicated. (B) Steady-state local densities of lipid chain (carbon atoms, green), DNA (phosphorus atoms, blue), and ionic current (streamlines). The arrows indicate the direction of the local ionic current flux and the colors show the flux’ magnitude. The maps were computed from a 672 ns MD trajectory at a + 100 mV bias sampled with a frequency of 240 ps per frame; radially averaged about the central axis of the duplex (z-axis) to improve the resolution. (C) Cumulative charge transmitted across the lipid bilayer at +100 mV (orange), +30 mV (green), −30 mV (red), and −100 mV (blue) transmembrane biases. The instantaneous currents were sampled every 2.4 ps. The cumulative charge curves were obtained by integrating the respective instantaneous current curves versus simulation time. (D) The simulated current–voltage characteristics. To compute the error, instantaneous ionic currents were block averaged with a block size of 9.6 ns. The error bars were computed as the standard error of the mean of the block averaged values. The dashed line represents a linear fit.