Jejoong Yoo1, Aleksei Aksimentiev2. 1. Center for the Physics of Living Cells, Department of Physics and Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. aksiment@illinois.edu and Center for Self-assembly and Complexity, Institute for Basic Science, Pohang, 37363, Republic of Korea. 2. Center for the Physics of Living Cells, Department of Physics and Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. aksiment@illinois.edu.
Abstract
In contrast to ordinary polymers, the vast majority of biological macromolecules adopt highly ordered three-dimensional structures that define their functions. The key to folding of a biopolymer into a unique 3D structure or to an assembly of several biopolymers into a functional unit is a delicate balance between the attractive and repulsive forces that also makes such self-assembly reversible under physiological conditions. The all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) method has emerged as a powerful tool for studies of individual biomolecules and their functional assemblies, encompassing systems of ever increasing complexity. However, advances in parallel computing technology have outpaced the development of the underlying theoretical models-the molecular force fields, pushing the MD method into an untested territory. Recent tests of the MD method have found the most commonly used molecular force fields to be out of balance, overestimating attractive interactions between charged and hydrophobic groups, which can promote artificial aggregation in MD simulations of multi-component protein, nucleic acid, and lipid systems. One route towards improving the force fields is through the NBFIX corrections method, in which the intermolecular forces are calibrated against experimentally measured quantities such as osmotic pressure by making atom pair-specific adjustments to the non-bonded interactions. In this article, we review development of the NBFIX (Non-Bonded FIX) corrections to the AMBER and CHARMM force fields and discuss their implications for MD simulations of electrolyte solutions, dense DNA systems, Holliday junctions, protein folding, and lipid bilayer membranes.
In contrast to ordinary polymers, the vast majority of biological macromolecules adopt highly ordered three-dimensional structures that define their functions. The key to folding of a biopolymer into a unique 3D structure or to an assembly of several bion class="Chemical">polymers into a functional unit is a delicate balance between the attractive and repulsive forces that also makes such self-assembly reversible under physiological conditions. The all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) method has emerged as a powerful tool for studies of individual biomolecules and their functional assemblies, encompassing systems of ever increasing complexity. However, advances in parallel computing technology have outpaced the development of the underlying theoretical models-the molecular force fields, pushing the MD method into an untested territory. Recent tests of the MD method have found the most commonly used molecular force fields to be out of balance, overestimating attractive interactions between charged and hydrophobic groups, which can promote artificial aggregation in MD simulations of multi-component protein, nucleic acid, and lipid systems. One route towards improving the force fields is through the NBFIX corrections method, in which the intermolecular forces are calibrated against experimentally measured quantities such as osmotic pressure by making atom pair-specific adjustments to the non-bonded interactions. In this article, we review development of the NBFIX (Non-Bonded FIX) corrections to the AMBER and CHARMM force fields and discuss their implications for MD simulations of electrolyte solutions, dense DNA systems, Holliday junctions, protein folding, and lipid bilayer membranes.
Authors: Jonathan E Kohn; Ian S Millett; Jaby Jacob; Bojan Zagrovic; Thomas M Dillon; Nikolina Cingel; Robin S Dothager; Soenke Seifert; P Thiyagarajan; Tobin R Sosnick; M Zahid Hasan; Vijay S Pande; Ingo Ruczinski; Sebastian Doniach; Kevin W Plaxco Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-08-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Peter L Freddolino; Anton S Arkhipov; Steven B Larson; Alexander McPherson; Klaus Schulten Journal: Structure Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell Journal: J Chem Theory Comput Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 6.006
Authors: Petra Kührová; Vojtěch Mlýnský; Marie Zgarbová; Miroslav Krepl; Giovanni Bussi; Robert B Best; Michal Otyepka; Jiří Šponer; Pavel Banáš Journal: J Chem Theory Comput Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 6.006
Authors: Maxim B Prigozhin; Yi Zhang; Klaus Schulten; Martin Gruebele; Taras V Pogorelov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Williams E Miranda; Kevin R DeMarco; Jiqing Guo; Henry J Duff; Igor Vorobyov; Colleen E Clancy; Sergei Yu Noskov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 11.205