Literature DB >> 27171127

Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI.

John Moult1, Krzysztof Fidelis2, Andriy Kryshtafovych2, Torsten Schwede3, Anna Tramontano4.   

Abstract

Modeling of protein structure from amino acid sequence now plays a major role in structural biology. Here we report new developments and progress from the CASP11 community experiment, assessing the state of the art in structure modeling. Notable points include the following: (1) New methods for predicting three dimensional contacts resulted in a few spectacular template free models in this CASP, whereas models based on sequence homology to proteins with experimental structure continue to be the most accurate. (2) Refinement of initial protein models, primarily using molecular dynamics related approaches, has now advanced to the point where the best methods can consistently (though slightly) improve nearly all models. (3) The use of relatively sparse NMR constraints dramatically improves the accuracy of models, and another type of sparse data, chemical crosslinking, introduced in this CASP, also shows promise for producing better models. (4) A new emphasis on modeling protein complexes, in collaboration with CAPRI, has produced interesting results, but also shows the need for more focus on this area. (5) Methods for estimating the accuracy of models have advanced to the point where they are of considerable practical use. (6) A first assessment demonstrates that models can sometimes successfully address biological questions that motivate experimental structure determination. (7) There is continuing progress in accuracy of modeling regions of structure not directly available by comparative modeling, while there is marginal or no progress in some other areas. Proteins 2016; 84(Suppl 1):4-14.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASP; community wide experiment; protein structure modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27171127      PMCID: PMC5394799          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  57 in total

1.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)--round 6.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Burkhard Rost; Tim Hubbard; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

3.  Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category.

Authors:  Domenico Cozzetto; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Michele Ceriani; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007

4.  Evaluation of CASP8 model quality predictions.

Authors:  Domenico Cozzetto; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

5.  A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods.

Authors:  J Moult; J T Pedersen; R Judson; K Fidelis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-11

6.  Crystal structure of YecO from Haemophilus influenzae (HI0319) reveals a methyltransferase fold and a bound S-adenosylhomocysteine.

Authors:  K Lim; H Zhang; A Tempczyk; N Bonander; J Toedt; A Howard; E Eisenstein; O Herzberg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-12-01

7.  Isotope labeling strategies for the study of high-molecular-weight proteins by solution NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Vitali Tugarinov; Voula Kanelis; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  CASP9 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis; John Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-14

Review 9.  Protein structure prediction and model quality assessment.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 7.851

10.  Evaluation of free modeling targets in CASP11 and ROLL.

Authors:  Lisa N Kinch; Wenlin Li; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-01-20
View more
  72 in total

1.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XII.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-12-15

2.  I-TASSER gateway: A protein structure and function prediction server powered by XSEDE.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Chengxin Zhang; Eric W Bell; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Future Gener Comput Syst       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 7.187

3.  AlphaFold at CASP13.

Authors:  Mohammed AlQuraishi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  I-TASSER-MR: automated molecular replacement for distant-homology proteins using iterative fragment assembly and progressive sequence truncation.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Jouko Virtanen; Zhidong Xue; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Contact Potential for Structure Prediction of Proteins and Protein Complexes from Potts Model.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12.

Authors:  Jürgen Haas; Alessandro Barbato; Dario Behringer; Gabriel Studer; Steven Roth; Martino Bertoni; Khaled Mostaguir; Rafal Gumienny; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-12-17

7.  Protein homology model refinement by large-scale energy optimization.

Authors:  Hahnbeom Park; Sergey Ovchinnikov; David E Kim; Frank DiMaio; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The BioFragment Database (BFDb): An open-data platform for computational chemistry analysis of noncovalent interactions.

Authors:  Lori A Burns; John C Faver; Zheng Zheng; Michael S Marshall; Daniel G A Smith; Kenno Vanommeslaeghe; Alexander D MacKerell; Kenneth M Merz; C David Sherrill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Theoretical restrictions on longest implicit time scales in Markov state models of biomolecular dynamics.

Authors:  Anton V Sinitskiy; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Relative binding affinity prediction of farnesoid X receptor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2 using FEP.

Authors:  Christina Schindler; Friedrich Rippmann; Daniel Kuhn
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.